Decision and Hearing
Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:45 WIB | 229
Hanura’s Petition for Central Papua 5 Inadmissible

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) issued Decision Number 72-01-10-36/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 in the case of the 2024 Election Dispute (PHPU) of Members of DPR (House of Representatives) and DPRD (Regional Representative Councils) filed by the People's Conscience Party (Hanura).…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:43 WIB | 191
Contradictory Petitum Leads to Dismissal of the Democratic Party’s Petition in Central Java 5

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The total votes of the Democratic Party and the National Awakening Party (PKB) requested in the petitum are the same as the total votes stipulated by the Respondent in the General Elections Commission (KPU) Decree No. 360…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:43 WIB | 178
Examination of Democrat's Election Dispute in Kepulauan Yapen 1 Proceeds

JAKARTA (MKRI) - The Constitutional Court (MKRI) read out the excerpt of the Decree for case No. 129-01-14-33/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 on the 2024 DPRP/DPRK (the Papuan People’s Representatives’ Council/the Regency/City Legislative Council) for several electoral districts of Papua Province petitioned by the…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:42 WIB | 198
Dismissal of PKB's Election Dispute Petition in Central Java Due to Insufficient Physical Evidence

JAKARTA (MKRI) — During the Ruling Hearing of Decision No. 33-01-01-13/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 on the 2024 Election Dispute (PHPU) for Members of the DPR (House of Representatives) and Regional Legislative Council (DPRD) held on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, Constitutional Justice Ridwan Mansyur…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:41 WIB | 200
Golkar Candidate’s Petition for Mimika 3 Dismissed

JAKARTA, (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) issued Decision No. 53-02-04-36/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024 for the 2024 election results dispute petition filed by Ham Kora, candidate number 4 for Mimika Regency DPRD from Golkar (Party of Functional Groups) for the electoral district…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:39 WIB | 219
Locus Vague, PPP’s Petition for Central Java III Inadmissible

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) stated that the petition by the United Development Party (PPP) on the vote acquisition of candidates for the House of Representatives (DPR) of the electoral district of Central Java III was inadmissible. This…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:38 WIB | 170
Perindo Candidate's Petition for Papua Provincial DPRD Dapil 3 Dismissed, Court Lacks Authority to Adjudicate

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) declared the dismissal of the petition filed by Yosep Sapan, a candidate for the Papuan People's Representative Council (DPRP) for Papua Electoral District 3 of Papua Province from the United Indonesia Party (Perindo).…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:35 WIB | 186
Conflicting Petitions Result in Dismissal of PPP's Petition for Central Maluku District 3

JAKARTA, MKRI - The Constitutional Court (MK) dismissed the petition for the 2024 DPR/DPRD (House of Representatives/Regional Legislative Council) election results dispute for case No. 252-01-17-31/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024  on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The case was filed by the United Development…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 20:19 WIB | 152
Obscurity Leads to Inadmissibility: PAN’s Petition for Central Maluku 3

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) did not find any grounds in the petition that challenge the discrepancy in the vote margins of Candidate for the Regional Representative Council (DPRD) of Central Maluku Regency, electoral district Central Maluku 3,…read more



Image Tuesday, May 21, 2024 | 19:59 WIB | 141
Vague, NasDem’s Petition for Sorong 1 Declared Inadmissible

JAKARTA (MKRI) — The Constitutional Court (MK) decided that the petition by National Democratic Party (NasDem) on the 2024 Sorong Regency DPRD (Regional Legislative Council) election results dispute for the electoral district of Sorong 1 was inadmissible. The panel of justices…read more