Summary of the Decision

6/PUU-XVII/2019

Article 58 paragraph (1) of Law 5/2014 is contrary to Article 28C paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3), Article 28H paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), and paragraph (4), and Article 28I paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution

2/PUU-XVI/2018

Article I point 6 to point 21, the phrase `or other understanding` in the Elucidation of Article 59 paragraph (4) letter c, Article 62 paragraph (3), Article 80A, and Article 82A paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) are contrary to Article 1 paragraph (3), Article 28, Article 28C paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (1), Article 28E paragraph (2) and Article 28G paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution

20/PUU-XVII/2019

Article 210 paragraph (1), Article 348 paragraph (4), Article 348 paragraph (9), Article 350 paragraph (2), and Article 383 paragraph (2) of the Election Law is contrary to Article 22E paragraph (1), Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28C paragraph (2), Article 28D paragraph (1), Article 28D paragraph (3), Article 28I paragraph (2), and Article 28I paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution.

36/PUU-XVII/2019

Constitutionality review of Article 416 paragraph (1) of Law 7/2017 against the 1945 Constitution

90/PUU-XVI/2018

Judicial Review of Law Number 12 of 1995 concerning Corrections (Correctional Law) and Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims (Witness and Victim Protection Law) against the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia

31/PUU-XVII/2019

Judicial review of Article 62 paragraph (1), Article 63, Article 64 paragraph (3), and Elucidation of Article 65 paragraph (3) letter b of the Higher Education Law against the 1945 Constitution

102/PUU-XVI/2018

Judicial review of Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority (Law 21/2011) of the 1945 Constitution

39/PUU-XVII/2019

Article 416 paragraph (1) of the Election Law has the exact same formula as Article 159 paragraph (1) of the Presidential Election Law which has been canceled by the Constitutional Court through the Verdict of the Constitutional Court Number 50/PUU-XII/2014, so that it contradicts the 1945 Constitution

32/PUU-XVII/2019

Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of the Anti-Corruption Law harms the Petitioner`s constitutional rights by criminalizing all persons who harm the state`s financial or economy, without exception, including state-owned enterprise officials, although the person concerned has a good intention when carrying out corporate actions, thus contradicting the 1945 Constitution

24/PUU-XVII/2019

Article 449 paragraph (2), paragraph (5), and paragraph (6); Article 509; and Article 540 of the Election Law relating to a prohibition during the quiet period of announcing the survey or opinion poll results on the General Election, along with the criminal consequences are contrary to the 1945 Constitution