Court
Decision
15/PUU-XV/2017

Case Subject: The Judicial Review of the Law Number 28 of 2009 on Regional Taxes and Regional Retribution

  • Petition: 1.PT Tunas Jaya Pratama 2.PT Mappasindo 3.PT Gunungbayan Pratamacoal
    Lawyer : Ali Nurdin, SH., S.T., and team
  • Decision: To receive and grant the Petitioners' entire petition
  • Date: October 10, 2017
Decision (PDF) 359
15/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: The Judicial Review of Law Number 1 of 2004 regarding State Treasury

  • Petition: Drs. Burhan Manurung, MA Kusa Pemohon :-
  • Decision: To grant the Petitioner's petition in part
  • Date: September 28, 2017
Decision (PDF) 189
92/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: Review of Law Number 10 of 2016 on the Second Amendment to the Law Number 1 of 2015 on the Stipulation of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2004 in the Election of Governor, Regent, and Mayor into Law against Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

  • Petition: 1.Juri Ardiantoro, M.Si., Ph.D 2.Ida Budhiati, S.H., M.H 3.Sigit Pamungkas, S.IP., MA 4.Arief Budiman S.S., S.IP., MBA 5.Dr. Ferry Kurnia Rizkiyansyah, S.IP., M.Si 6.Drs. Hadar Nafis Gumay 7.Hasyim Asy'ari S.H., M.Si., Ph.D
    Lawyer : -
  • Decision: Granted for a part
  • Date: July 10, 2017
Decision (PDF) 331
56/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: Review of Law No. 23/2014 on Local Government against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

  • Petition: 1.Abda Khair Mufti 2.Muhammad Hafidz 3.Amal Subkhan 4.Solihin 5.Totok Ristiyono
    Lawyer : -
  • Decision: Granted for a part
  • Date: June 14, 2017
Decision (PDF) 312
54/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: The Judicial Review of Law Number 10 of 2016 regarding the Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 on Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2014 in the Election of Governor, Regent and Mayor Into Law

  • Petition: 1.Perkumpulan Teman Ahok 2.Gerakan Nasional Calon Independen (GNCI) 3.Perkumpulan Kebangkitan Indonesia Baru (PKIB)4.Tsamara Amany 5.Nong Darol Mahmada
    Lawyer : Andi Syafrani, S.H., MCCL, and team
  • Decision: To grant the Petitioners' petition in part
  • Date: June 14, 2017
Decision (PDF) 151
95/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: The Judicial Review of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates

  • Petition: 1.Dr. Stefanus Laksanto Utomo, S.H., M.H. 2.Lisa Marina, S.H., M.H. Kuasa Pemohhon : Dr. Arrisman, S.H., M.H., and team
  • Decision: 1. To grant the petition of the Petitioner in part; 2. To declare that Article 2 sub-article (1) of Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2003 Number 49, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4288) contradicts with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and does not have Legal force that is binding to the extent that it is not interpreted that those entitled to implement Special Education for Advocate Profession shall be an advocate organization with the obligation to work closely with higher educational institutions whose faculty of law shall have accreditation of B or law schools that shall have at least accreditation of B.
  • Date: May 23, 2017
Decision (PDF) 242
137/PUU-XIII/2015

Case Subject: The Judicial Review on the Law Number 23 of 2014 regarding the Local Government

  • Petition: 1.Asosiasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Seluruh Indonesia (APKASI 2.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Batubara, Provinsi Sumatera Utara 3.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Aceh Tengah, Provinsi Aceh 4.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Muara Enim, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan 5.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Belitung, Provinsi Bangka Belitung 6.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Merangin, Provinsi Jambi 7.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat, Provinsi Jambi 8.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Lampung Timur, Provinsi Lampung 9.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Tanggamus, Provinsi Lampung 10.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Lebak, Provinsi Banten 11.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bandung Barat, Provinsi Jawa Barat 12.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Majalengka, Provinsi Jawa Barat 13.Pemerintah Daerah Kota Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat 14.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Banjarnegara, Provinsi Jawa Tengah 15.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Pati, Provinsi Jawa Tengah 16.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Kulon Progo, Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 17.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Madiun, Provinsi Jawa Timur 18.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Trenggalek, Provinsi Jawa Timur 19.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bangli, Provinsi Bali 20.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Kapuas, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah 21.Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bulungan, Provinsi Kalimantan Utara
  • Decision: 1. To declare the petition of the Petitioner I, the Petitioner VIII, the Petitioner XVIII, the Petitioner XIX, the Petitioner XXI, the Petitioner XXIII, the Petitioner XXIV, the Petitioner XXXVI, the Petitioner XL to the Petitioner XLVII, cannot be accepted; 2. To declare the petition of the Petitioner II to the Petitioner VI, the Petitioner IX to the Petitioner XV, the Petitioner XVII, the Petitioner XXII, the Petitioner XXVI to the Petitioner XXIX, the Petitioner XXXI to the Petitioner XXXV, and the Petitioner XXXVII to the Petitioner XXXIX as long as the reviewing Article 9; Article 11; Article 12; Article 13; Article 14 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), and paragraph (4); Article 15; Article 16 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2); Article 17 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3); Article 21; Article 27 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2); Article 28 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Law Number 23 of 2014 regarding Regional Government (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 244 of 2014 and Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5587), cannot be accepted; 3. To grant the petition of the Petitioner II to the Petitioner VII, the Petitioner IX to the Petitioner XVII, the Petitioner XX, the Petitioner XXII, the Petitioner XXV to the Petitioner XXXV, and the Petitioner XXXVII to the Petitioner XXXIX as long as the reviewing Article 251 paragraph (2), paragraph (3), and paragraph (8) and paragraph (4) along the phrase “...cancellation of Regency/City Regulation and regent/mayor regulation as referred to in paragraph (2) shall be determined by the governor’s decision as representative of the Central Government” the Law Number 23 of 2014 regarding Regional Government (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 244 and Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5587); 4. To declare the phrase “Regency/City Regulation and” in Article 251 paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), the phrase “Regency/City Regulation and/or” in Article 251 paragraph (3), and the phrase “administrater of the Regency/City Government cannot accept the decision of cancellation of the regency/city regulation and” and the phrase” regency/city regulation or” in Article 251 paragraph (8) of the Law Number 23 of 2014 regarding Regional Government (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 244 and Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5587) is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and has no binding legal force; 5. To dismiss the petition of the Petitioner VII, the Petitioner XVI, the Petitioner XX, the Petitioner XXV, and the Petitioner XXX as long as the reviewing Article 9; Article 11; Article 12; Article 13; Article 14 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), and paragraph (4); Article 15; Article 16 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2); Article 17 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3); Article 21; Article 27 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2); Article 28 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Law Number 23 of 2014 regarding Regional Government (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 244 of 2014 and Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5587)
  • Date: April 5, 2017
Decision (PDF) 155
39/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: Review on the Law Number 42 of 2009 regarding the Third Amendment to the Law Number 8 of 1983 regarding Value Added Tax on Goods and Services and the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

  • Petition: 1.Dolly Hutari P, S.E 2.Sutejo
    Lawyer : Edu Hardi Ginting, S.H., and team
  • Decision: Granted for a part
  • Date: February 28, 2017
Decision (PDF) 159
49/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: Review on the Law Number 2 of 2004 regarding the Settlement of Disputes of Industrial Relations against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

  • Petition: Mustofa, S.H.
    Lawyer : Nova Harmoko, S.H., and team
  • Decision: Granted for a part
  • Date: February 21, 2017
Decision (PDF) 154
77/PUU-XIV/2016

Case Subject: Review on the Law Number 14 of 2008 regarding the Public Information Transparency against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

  • Petition: 1.Yayasan Penguatan Partisipasi Inisiatif and Kemitraan Masyarakat Indonesia (YAPPIKA) 2.Yayasan Pusat Telaah and Informasi Regional (PATTIRO) 3.Yayasan Perkumpulan Untuk Pemilu and Demokrasi (PERLUDEM) 4.Muhammad Djufryhard 5.Desiana Samosir
    Lawyer : Wahyudi Djafar, S.H. and team
  • Decision: Granted
  • Date: February 7, 2017
Decision (PDF) 174