The petitioner’s legal counsel, Iwan Kurniawan, conveyed the withdrawal of the judicial review on Law Number 1/1951 concerning Temporary Measures to Organize the Unity of the Power Structure and Procedures of Civil Courts, in the courtroom, on Tuesday (18/3/2025). Photo by MKRI/Panji.

JAKARTA (MKRI) - Frendys Eka Luki Putra returned to the Constitutional Court (MK) for the hearing of judicial review on Article 54 paragraph (2) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power (Judicial Power Law) and Article 206 paragraph (1) of the Legal Procedure for the Outer Regions of Java and Madura (RBg) which were promulgated and validated by Emergency law No. 1 of 1951 on Temporary Measures to Organize the Unity of the Structure of the Powers and Procedures of Civil Courts on Tuesday (18/3/2025). However, through Iwan Kurniawan as the petitioner’s legal counsel, in the petition revision hearing, he stated that the Principal was withdrawing the petition for Case Number 8/PUU-XXIII/2025.

Regarding this, Chief Justice Suhartoyo clarified to the Petitioner's legal counsel. "The Court has received a letter from the Registrar's Office stating that the Petitioner has withdrawn the petition for the case on the grounds that it will be substantially prepared one more time so that it will be brought forward again later. Therefore, the Panel will convey this withdrawal to the justice deliberation meeting (RPH)," explained Chief Justice Suhartoyo, who led the Panel together with Constitutional Justices Daniel Yusmic P. Foekh and M. Guntur Hamzah from MK Plenary Courtroom.

Previously at the preliminary hearing (5/3/2025), the Petitioner stated that in a concrete case, he had suffered losses due to the execution and auction actions carried out by the Chief Justice of the Pontianak District Court, Agung Wibowo, who had deliberately engineered the execution of the court's auction decision by including the Petitioner's Certificate of Title (SHM) in the Auction Execution Order Determination. In fact, the Petitioner was not involved at all in the civil case that was executed and even the empty land belong to him had never been subject to execution seizure. As a result of this action, Agung Wibowo as the executor was investigated by the Supreme Court Supervisory Board and the Judicial Commission and was sentenced to become a non-judge for two years. (*)

Author            : Sri Pujianti.
Editor             : Lulu Anjarsari P.
PR                 : Andhini S.F.
Translator      : SO (YS)

Disclaimer: The original version of the news is in Indonesian. In case of any differences between the English and the Indonesian versions, the Indonesian version will prevail.