---

Secretary-General M. Guntur Hamzah delivering a presentation in the Socialization of Bureaucratic Reform 2021 and Evaluation of the Constitutional Court’s Bureaucratic Reform 2020 both in-person and virtual, Tuesday (22/06/2021). Photo by Humas MK/Ilham W. M.

Wednesday, June 23, 2021 | 08:28 WIB

JAKARTA, Public Relations—The Constitutional Court (MK) organized “The Socialization of Bureaucratic Reform of 2020–2021” on Tuesday, June 22, 2021. The event was aimed at formulating the Court’s organizational accountability to optimize the functions of the internal Bureaucratic Reform (BR) team, assessors, and the internal assessment team in monitoring and evaluating the implementation of bureaucratic reform in the Registrar’s Office and Secretariat-General of the Constitutional Court. The 139 participants of the event were the central BR team, the work unit BR teams, the work unit assessment team, as well as the officials and staff members relevant to the Court’s BR.

Secretary-General M. Guntur Hamzah in his opening presentation reported that the Court’s BR index in 2020 was 75.24 or “very good” according to the Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Ministry Letter No. B/86/M.RB.06/2021 dated March 31, 2021 regarding the Evaluation Results of the Bureaucratic Reform Implementation of 2020. A survey on public perception on the Court’s services in 2020 showed an index of 3.62 of 4.0, which is slightly higher than the national average and increased from the previous year’s index of 3.61. The survey indicates that stakeholders had a higher satisfaction of the Court’s services. 

Improvement of Performance

The Court invited Ronald Andrea Annas, the Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Ministry’s Deputy Assistant for Bureaucratic Reform Policy Formulation, Apparatus Accountability, and Supervision, to provide direction and inputs for the Court’s performance and assessment results. He said that internal and external environments affect an organization’s performance. SWOT analysis is imperative in the beginning to assess its strengths and weaknesses in order to achieve optimal performance.

“It must be noted that not all [aspects] of BR are appropriate for the Constitutional Court’s context. Therefore, all the things that have been explained about BR should be used as a reference and then be developed and adjusted to the institution’s needs,” he said.

Ronald then talked about BR strategies in 2020–2024, especially at the national level. He said that the Constitutional Court is at the micro-level, while the Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Ministry is at the micro- and median levels. Both institutions, however, must create good organizational and business processes. At the micro-level, it means that the Court has units that work towards improving its own performance. While at the median level, the Court helps all of its unit to create a unit to improve the Court. The used the Inspectorate as an example. The Inspectorate also has to control itself internally so that the entire Court be able to achieve targets of good governance.

“Do not follow the Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Ministry to the book, but follow the ideal implementation that suit the Constitutional Court’s own performance,” Ronald concluded.

Link to the YouTube video: https://youtu.be/OZUFd5Mk3vk

Writer        : Sri Pujianti
Editor        : Nur R.
Translator  : Yuniar Widiastuti (NL)

Translation uploaded on 6/23/2021 13:47 WIB

Disclaimer: The original version of the news is in Indonesian. In case of any differences between the English and the Indonesian version, the Indonesian version will prevail.

---