---

Applicant’s Attorney Afdaludin delivered revision points in revision session of Act of General Courts on Monday (7/3) in Plenary Room, the Constitutional Court Building. Photo PR/Ganie

 

 

 

The Constitutional Court (MK) again held judicial review session of Act No. 2 Year 1986 of General Courts (UU Peradilan Umum), on Monday (7/3) in Plenary Room, the Constitutional Court Building. Lombok residents Mamiq Pahri, Nuraini, Fahrurrozi, and Sapi’in revised their petition.

Representing by Applicants’ attorney Afdaludin, the Applicant of Case No. 5/PUU-XIV/2016 argued they had revised petition in accordance with Justice Panel’s input. They revised petition demands which previously requested the Court to annul Supreme Court verdict.

“Initially we request (Supreme Court, ed) verdict annulations. We aren’t concern on it anymore because the Constitutional Court has no jurisdiction to annul the verdict. What we revised is the execution of Article 60 that we consider applied conditionally constitutional,” said Afdaludin to Justice Panel led by Deputy Chief Anwar Usman.

Responding the revision, Anwar said Justice Panel will discuss the revision in Justice’s Consultative Meeting (RPH). “Allright. We will report the revision in Justice’s Consultative Meeting,” said him.

In previous session, the Applicant considered harmed by Article 60 Act of General Courts. The Article was used for land execution by Selong district court (PN Selong) which mandated to conduct Supreme Court Reconsideration Judgment No. 24/PDT/1995. The execution was stated in Execution Minutes No. 8/HK.PT.G/1994/PN.SEL dated December 20, 1994. The Applicants were even stated as litigant in this case.

The Applicants argued Article 60 Act of General Courts didn’t explain on what kind of civil case verdict that district court’s registrar in charge of it. Therefore, they assessed the Article harmed their constitutional rights. (Ilham/lul/Prasetyo Adi N)

 

---