Constitutional Court (MK) eventually declined all demands of Act 18/2003 Judicial Review about Advocate as filed by O.C Kaligis. “Verdict, declining all Applicant’s pleading entirely,” Hamdan Zoelva recited in the verdict hearing, Thursday (9/11).

The Court states that singular professional organization doesn’t bar level treat to conduct Advocates Special Education (PKPA). The formation was meant to educate advocate to overcome law discipline and practice well-qualified tenure.

According to the Court, the organization must restrict and develop the recruitment process so that the institution generates competitive professionals to face the world that, presumably, needs their expertise. Singular professional organization is also seen to give certain qualification under well-maintain supervision.

Wasn’t meant to hamper other organizations to conduct such training, but the accomplishment must be supervised under well-structured organization whose formation is determined in particular Act. The lawsuit was considered to not deliberate norms of constitution, instead, it is an implementation problem.  

As known, The Plaintiff reviews Advocate Act as the Article 2 verse (1) of which says, “Advocate is the bachelor whose background is legal education and has passed Advocate Special Training conducted by Advocate Organization,”. (Nano Tresna Arfana/mh/kun)