Constitutional Court decides to decline Justice and United Indonesia Party’s (PKPI) and National Democratic Party’s (Nasdem) pleadings for South Kalimantan PHPU feud after the Sentence was recited on Friday (27/6).

On PKPI’s pleading, the Court sees that Plaintiff’s exception is deceiving or obscuur libel. In the Proving Trial, the Plaintiff had never shown up. Moreover, the Plaintiff didn’t even presented any evidence to plead over. To those considerations, the Court decides to decline.

“The Sentence, to decline the lawsuit entirely” Head of MK, Hamdan Zoelva recited accompanied by others Justices.

Meanwhile, for Nasdem’s plea, the Court found that the presented C1 model of TPS 12 Keraton was not as complete as being argued, while the presented evidence of C1 model for TPS 17 and 20   were lack of event news. Another requirement was also missed in the D1 form, as no signature and stamp were feat on the evidence. Therefore, the Court sees the pleadings to lost it legal basis.

Unacceptable Lawsuits

To People’s Conscience Party (Hanura) and Star Crescent Party (PBB), the Court stated the two filed lawsuits have gone unacceptable. Hanura’s lawsuit of DPR RI and Province DPRD candidate in South Kalimantan are considered deceiving. The two lawsuits were thrown off upon Sentence (05-14/PHPU-DPR-DPRD/XII/2014) dated May 28, 2014.   

“The lawsuit which pleaded mentioned dapil do not explain any error as being accused conducted by the Defendant, as well as missed description of result substitution. Thus, the lawsuits cannot be granted as determined on Article 75 Act of Constitutional Court,” the Court described. (Nano Tresna Arfana/mh)