Constitutional Court re- hears a case on the Narcotics Act filed a methamphetamine user, Firman Ramang Putra, Monday (25/11). At this meeting Muhammad Yusuf Hasibuan as the attorney submit repair requests on the subject of the petition and the petition application in accordance with the advice of judges at a preliminary hearing that was held on Monday (11/11) ago.

Hasibuan said in principle applicant has realized his actions consume methamphetamine is against the provisions of Article 111 paragraph ( 2 ) , Article 112 paragraph ( 1 ) , and Article 114 paragraph ( 2 ) Narcotics Act. However, the Applicant was not getting justice because in the case of the Petitioner an alleged narcotic as well as the owner of that Applicant was sentenced to punishments as severe.

“If the company may be likened to a company led by the chief executive and has many employees who supervise various levels and are divided into various levels, that is where the determination of wages and income are taken into account in an enterprise in accordance with an employee’s performance appraisal. But that is unfortunate, Act No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics are not at all able to distinguish the role and the threat of punishment is very unfair in an illegal distribution of narcotics which is a crime that is structured, systematic, and thus result in a buildup of organized drug addicts and / or narcotics abusers in detention centers across the country in Indonesia," said Hasibuan explains the reason his client request.

Feeling aggrieved by it , Petitioner asks the Court to declare Article 111 paragraph ( 2 ) , Article 112 paragraph ( 1 ) , and Article 114 paragraph ( 2 ) of the Act is contrary to the Narcotics Act of 1945 and does not have binding legal force . “In closing this section allow us Petitioner cites the following Qur’anic verse translation. And if you decide the case, then the case was decided between them with justice. Truly Allah loves those who are fair. "Surat Al - Maidah verse 42," said Hasibuan trying to convince a panel of judges led by Judge Maria Farida Indrati.

In this session opportunity, Mary was endorsed seven exhibits submitted by the Applicant that one of them is an indictment. ( YustiNurul Agustin / mh )