Langkat Regency rejects the proposition expressed by the two pairs of candidates’ regent and deputy regent. This was revealed in court dispute resolution of Langkat election results on Thursday (21/11), in the Meeting Room of the Court. Two candidates for regent and deputy regent listed as the applicant, Candidate Number 1 Boediono - Abdul Khair (Case No. 171/PHPU.D-XI/2013) and Candidate Pair Number 3 Yunus Saragih – Syahmadi Fiddin (Case No. 172/PHPU.D-XI/2013).

In the trial to hear the answer of the Respondent and Related Party, Agussyah Ramadani Damanik as attorney of Langkat Regency (Respondent) Election Commission denied Langkat election done without supervision.

 “That is absolutely not true. Our first view that the existence of the legal position with the Supervisory Committee Langkat Regency is equivalent, have independence. It is true that the Supervisory Committee and the Commission are contingent organizer, but there is an authority of the rights in the Act No. 15 of 2011. Thus, the Commission would not provide any further response to internal problems Supervisory Committee,"said Agussyah in front of the judges, led by Deputy Chief Justice Arief Hidayat.

Present at the trial, Chairman of the Commission of Langkat Margono Zumintoro which explains the formation of Langkat Election. According to him, the implementation of Langkat Election had been supervised by Bawaslu North Sumatra. “North Sumatra permanent Bawaslu only formed in July of 2013. That is, the fitting stage Langkat come Election Supervisory Committee supervised by existing, Honor, which organizes the supervision of the two previous elections," he explained.

Langkat Regency as the Respondent also revealed the petition does not meet the formal requirements set forth by PMK 15/2008.

Verification on Diploma S1

Expressed by Ngogesa Sitepu - Sulistianto as Related Parties in this case, through their legal counsel, Hadiningtyas, denied the verification stage is not passed to the Related Parties of educational backgrounds. “The Applicant alleges that the Respondent Party does not verify the diploma S1. In fact that The Respondent has been verified, there is his official report," he said.

At the previous hearing, the Applicant explains the delay in the formation of several violations including Election Supervisory Committee, money politics, the involvement of civil servants, and the use of local budgets by Candidate Number 4 NgogesaS itepu -Sulistiyanto (Related Parties). In this case the Related Parties is the incumbent candidate. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh )