Constitutional Court held a trial court judgment pronunciation of Makassar City Election Dispute filed by Supomo Guntur - Kadir Halid, Muhyina Muin - Syaiful Shaleh, and Irman Yasin Limpo - Busra Abdullah, Tuesday (22/10). Court in each case the ruling of the Election Makassar three states rejected the third request.

Hamdan Zoelva who led the trial court verdict is third third reading the conclusion of the decision by saying that the petition of the Petitioners are not proven and no legal grounds. Therefore, the Court ruled on the case in the three states rejected the petition in entirety. "The verdict, hearing, stated in the Exception, Exception Respondent refused. In the Principal Application, rejected the petition in its entirety," said Hamdan ruling of the Court’s reading sounds the same for the three cases with the number 138/PHPU.D-XI/2013, 139/PHPU.D-XI/2013, and 140/PHPU.D-XI/2013.

One of the arguments of the Petitioners that assessed court was not legally proven that the presence of ID card procurement is facilitated by increasing the vote one candidate. After looking at the evidence presented by the applicant and the Commission of Makassar and the facts revealed in the trial, the Court held there was no convincing evidence that the Commission has made it easier Makassar city administration services Identity Card in public places for the sake of winning one pair candidate and a policy of allowing people to choose only by using the ID card is not even listed in DPT and DPS.

While the argument of structured, systematic, and massive violations by KPU Makassar and Related Parties, the Court considers the arguments related to it is not evidenced by a fairly convincing evidence that there has been a violation of the Election of Makassar in 2013 that is structured, systematic and massive. ( Yusti Nurul Agustin / mh )