Constitutional Court held a hearing of Madiun Election Dispute filed by candidate number 3 Parji - Inda Raya in case number 112/PHPU.D-XI/2013. The trial, led by Deputy Chief Justice Hamdan Zoelva on Tuesday ( 24/9 ) with the agenda to hear testimony from Related Parties and witnesses of the applicant.

Chairman of the campaign team winning candidate number 6 Bondan Panji Saputro explained that the winning team of the Related Party never share or print a sample ballot, never giving money to the City of Madiun resident voters, and do not involve government officials.

Madiun City Council member Robin Rohmana denied Petitioner the distribution of money a team successful candidate number 6. "The victory gained by the candidate number 6 nothing other than work hard and success as an incumbent for the last 5 years leading the City of Madison," said Robi.

Rusdiyanto, Head of DPPKAD explained, government programs have been outlined in the City of Madiun budget in 2013 has been pursued through discussion of the mechanisms and procedures to budget changes proposed budget changes . The budget is used to fund social assistance 12 -year compulsory education program and repair places of worship. Associated with the increase in the budget of 10 billion, Rusdiyanto explained the funds were used to renovate the house unfit for human habitation which is from the program in 2010 and had nothing to do with Election City of Madiun.

In addition, as many as 10 witnesses Related Parties are also not properly convey the distribution of the money being made by the Related Parties. Instead, the witnesses said the applicant who has made money politics and intimidation to the residents.

Distribution of Money

Meanwhile, the addition of Petitioner’s witness as many as 10 people conveyed the distribution of money to the citizens of 50 thousands rupiah, up to 200 thousands rupiah. This is done by a team of successful candidate number 6 to be able to win a pair of incumbent Bambang Ismianto - Sugeng Rismianto.

After hearing the testimony of the witnesses, the judge approved the constitution of the evidence each of the litigants. Because the City of Madiun Election Dispute trial has been completed, each party must collect the conclusion to the Court through the secretariat.

The trial will be held back by listening to the pronunciation of the agenda of the ruling of the Constitutional Court. ( Panji Erawan / mh )