---

Puncak Regency Election Commission rejected the argument regarding the violations structured, massive and systematic does in organizing Election Peak District, Papua. This was stated by Puncak Regency Election Commission’s attorney, Nahar as the Respondent at the hearing to hear the answer Respondent, Related Party and Proof on Thursday (14/3).

"Respondent rejected the Applicant argued all. The merits of the case, the Respondent denied the proposition expressed by the applicant," said Nahar in front of the judges, chaired by Judge M. Akil Mochtar.

According to Nahar, untrue and completely unfounded the arguments of the Respondent’s petition using Form DA1-KWK.KPU in setting recapitulation of the vote in two districts, namely Pogomo District and Ilaga District. Moreover, continued Nahar, the argument of the DA1-KWK.KPU Form signed by the Chairman of PPD is not untrue.

 "Respondent has the recapitulation using Form DA1-KWK.KPU accordance with legislation. Recapitulation Respondent invalid because signed by PPD and ranks and witnessed by Election Supervisory Committee. The DA1 Forms of Pogomo and Ilaga in accordance with the actual as witnessed also by the community," he explained.

Meanwhile, Related Party Willem Wandik-Repinus Teleggen represented Peter Eli considers the petition wrong in deciding the request object (error in objecto). Applicants should use the DB-KWK.KPU, not only using KPU Decree No. 8 peak at 2013 on Selected Establishment of Candidate Mayor and Vice Mayor of Puncak Regency 2013 dated February 25, 2013.

"In the exception, the applicant should be one of the objects that define the object is a news event and DB KWK.KPU KPU Decree No. 8 peak at 2013 on Establishment Candidate Mayor and Vice Mayor Selected Peak District Year 2013 dated February 25, 2013 as well," he said.

Not only have that, Peter also assessed any inconsistencies in the petition. In the petition, the Petitioner asks the judges to determine applicant as the winner, but at other points, Petitioners request that the General Election held back, then deem the request is not acceptable," he said.

While concerning violations of Pogoma District, Petitioner argues that the Petitioner got 12 thousand votes, while the PT got zero votes. This is according to Peter, is not true. "Turnout at 2531 tally Related Party because the Party concerned is a native son of Pogomo and voting is done by force," he said.

In the second trial, the Petitioner presented 10 witnesses, most of whom are still speaking regions. Several witnesses who could use Indonesian give information about the abuse of the system by the Respondent as noken election. "In my place, there are four villages that voted at the polling station and is allowed by its chairman PPS," said Sekio Merit testified.

Another thing revealed by Amandus Tabudi that reveals there are 5 polling stations in the village, but only one to vote in accordance with applicable law by voting. "There were five polling stations in my hometown. But on February 14, 2013, at four polling stations using noken system, the rest voted as usual," he said.

On Friday, March 15, 2013 it will be held again tomorrow evidentiary hearing to listen to the witnesses who uses original language with number 18/PHPU.D-XI/2013. In petition filed by candidate number 5 Elvis Tabuni-TE A Hery Dosinaen, the applicant claimed a violation of a structured, massive and systematic by Puncak Regency Election Commission.

Not only that, the applicant objected to the KPU Decree No. 8 peak at 2013 on Establishment Candidate Mayor and Vice Mayor Selected Peak District Year 2013 dated February 25, 2013. Petitioners argue that the Commission Peak District, Papua as Respondent manipulated votes cast in the two districts, the Pogoma District and the Ilaga District. According to Agustinus, at the plenary of recapitulation, the Respondent put on Form DA and DA1 are not true and cheating. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh)

---