---

Responding to the petition filed by the candidate Septiana Zuraidah - Bambang Hermanto, Pagar Alam Election Commission considered Petitioner fled. It is delivered by Pagar Alam Election Commission attorney Tommy Indriadi on court hearing on Respondent\'s response, as well as verification of the Related Party, on Monday (11/2) at the Plenary Court.

 

"The calculation of the correct sound version of the Applicant is not clear. Petitioner\'s petition was not clear and did not meet the formal requirements. Based on the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, violation structured, massive and systematic not met, because the applicant did not describe what a structured offense, systematic and massive, "he said before the judges of the Constitutional Court is headed by Deputy Chief Justice Achmad Sodiki.

 

Tommy also denied a voice recapitulation is problematic because there is no question about the recap voice. He said he regretted the applicant directly dispute this to the Constitutional Court. "But it can be solved by Supervisory Committee, not by the Court. As for excess ballots as argued by the applicant, the number of ballot papers used for the 6000 repair of damaged ballots, "he explained respond to requests 8/PHPU.D-XI/2013 number.

 

Meanwhile, the Related Party incumbent partner Ida Fitriati-Novirzah denied all allegations that Petitioner disclosed in the previous trial. According to the Related Parties, request the applicant is not the authority of the Court, because the petition is not about counting votes. "The applicant deadline in filing was too late," he said.

 

Related parties also denied any intimidation by his side. "It is not true because there is no clear description. Matter of the suit in the DPP Barnas, these internal issues of Barnas and has been resolved internally," he said.

 

At the hearing, the Petitioners also presented seven witnesses corroborate the arguments expressed by the Petitioner. Mursidi Muis, for example revealed the movements of the support expressed by the National Front Party (Barnas). "Barnas has been providing support to the family number 9 (Applicant) in February 2012, but in October 2012, support for the move," he explained.

 

Meanwhile, Romi Ilsandy, applicants other witnesses spoke of the excess printing of ballot papers up to 6,000 ballots. Cooperative Panca Budi Bangun requested to print ballots; I see the addition of 6000 sheets. DPT should be customized printing with 127,000 pieces," he explained.

 

Through their attorney, Fuadi Helmi expressed objections to KPU Decree on Establishment of Pagar Alam 01/kpts/kpu.kpa/2013 Election Vote Count Results City of Pagar Alam Year 2013. According to Fuadi, Pagar Alam Election Commission has violated structured, massive and systematic. In addition, Fuadi explained that the Respondent had printed ballots intentionally exaggerated. The number of voters in the voters list (DPT) City of Pagar Alam Election Year 2013 was 98,368 and as many as are prescribed by law the number of printed ballots as the number of voters plus 2.5% to spare. However, further Fuadi, in fact the number of ballots printed and received by the Respondent of the printing exceeds the amount of currency select plus 2.5%, which is over 6000 sheets of letter sounds. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh)

---