Couple Eremen Yogosam-Leonard Doga (Eremen-Leonard) asked the Constitutional Court to cancel the minutes of the plenary meeting of the General Elections Commission (KPU) District Central Mamberamo (Mamteng) dated December 19, 2012. Couple number 4 is also asking the Court ordered the Election Commission to appoint a couple Eremen-Leonard as the winner of the most votes. If the second request is not granted, the couple Eremen-Leonard asked the voting in all polling stations in Mamteng district.

"Or at least ordered the Respondent to vote again two districts, Eragayam and Megambilis District."

Similarly, petition of Eremen-Leonard delivered by his lawyer, Muh Sattu Pali in a trial in the Constitutional Court (MK), Wednesday (01/16/2012) afternoon. The trial introduction to case number 1/PHPU.D-XI/2013 happenings dispute election results of regional head and deputy regional head (Election) Mamteng 2012 was conducted by the Panel of Constitutional Judges Maria Farida Indrati (Panel Chair), Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi and Anwar Usman.

Couple Eremen-Leonard argued, on December 19, 2012 plenary meeting of the Commission Mamteng implement sound recapitulation. Though the two districts, the District Megambilis and the District Eragayam not implemented recap. "Recapitulation made by the Respondent on December 19, 2012 that there are two PPD, the PPD Megambilis and Eragayam District that have not implemented the recapitulation, but the Respondent has been first the recapitulation in the district," said Muh. Sattu Pali, Eremen-Leonard attorney.

Through Sattu Pali, couples Eremen-Leonard also argued violations committed by Respondent (Mamteng Election Commission). At December 11, 2012 as polling day throughout Mamteng District implemented, voters who live in TPS 1 and TPS 2 Kampung Dogobak, TPS 1 Binime Kampung, Kampung Yagabur TPS 1 and TPS 1 and TPS 2 Kampung Pelanme, cannot use their right to vote because of the unavailability of ballot boxes, news events, and Form C-1 in each polling station. Then when the recap at the District Selection Committee (PPD) Kelila District on December 17, 2012, and PPS KPPS reading her recap and prepare minutes of the six polling stations.

"Witness Candidate Pair Number 4 and Number 5 protest and objection to Respondent, on the grounds that the voters at the polling places that we mentioned earlier, never to vote," said Sattu Pali.

Sattu Pali later revealed the professionalism of Mamteng Commission due to differences in the level of sound results recap PPD Kalila district with a recap at the district level. The results recap voice at PPD Kelila District, Pagawak-mate David Simon Kenelak (Number 1) does not get zero sound alias, pair R. Ham-Yonas Pagawak Kenelak (Number 2) 5578 voice-mate Daniel Tabuni Luke Polona (Number 3) 29 votes, pair-Leonard Eremen Yogosam Doga (Number 4) 341 votes, and the pair Kalvin Bilin-Thimotius Karoba (No. 5) 2541 votes. But at the recap at the district level, the number of votes for the District Kelila is Number 1 with the acquisition of 862 votes, Number 2 as the voice 5071, Number 3 by 29 votes, Number 4 as much as 341 votes, and Number 5 as 2616 . "With the events conducted by the Respondent, we assume that the Respondent was not professional and obviously perform tasks with responsibility," pointing Sattu Pali.

In addition, Sattu Pali also revealed violations that occurred in the district Eragayam. When recap at PPD Eragayam, said Sattu Pali, the Respondent did not accommodate the voting results of three polling stations consisting of TPS 1 Arsbol Kampung, Kampung Pagale TPS 1 and TPS 1 Kampung Wanilok. The recapitulation at the district level (Eragayam), witnesses candidate number 5 and number 4 filed an objection to the Respondent to stop counting, before 3 TPS is telling or reading tally voice. But the objection is not accommodated," said Sattu Pali.

According to Sattu Pali, recapitulation voting results at the district level Mamteng true that is, couples Number 1 get 3688 votes (12.60%), couples Number 2 as 8812 votes (28.5%), couples Number 3 as much as 1843 sound (6.30%), couples Number 4 as much as 10,363 votes (35.4%), and as many as five couples Number 5168 votes (17.65%).

Furthermore, the panel of judges examining the results of the General Election Mamteng dispute filed by the couple Demi Wanimbo-Naftali Karoba (Demi-Naftali), which is the case 2/PHPU.D-XI/2013. The couple objected to the publication of Decree (SK) KPU Mamteng No. 17 of 2012, dated December 19, 2012. Couple Demi-Naftali is candidates who would otherwise not qualify because it does not meet the requirements.

Couple Demi-Naftali, through his attorney, John Richard, said Mamteng Commission has issued Decree No. 08 Year 2012 on the Establishment Candidate Regent and Vice Regent of the Participant Election. Issuance of the decree, said John, was issued by unlawful means. Therefore it has filed a lawsuit to the Administrative Court of Jayapura and have decided on December 7, 2012 with the verdict, the judges PTUN Jayapura cancel KPU Decree No. 08 of 2012, dated 10 November 2012. "The decree was issued by the Respondent in violation of the law," said John Richard. (Nur Rosihin Ana / mh)