Preliminary examination of dispute of election result (PHPU) of Bekasi Election- Case No. 4 and 5/PHPU.D-XI/2013  held by the Constitutional Court on Wednesday (16/1) afternoon. Petitioner I (Case No. 4) questioned the determination of the results of the General Election vote count Bekasi unlawful. Petitioner II (Case No. 5), among others questioned Respondent negligence on factual verification.

Couple Sumiyati-Anim Imamuddin (Petitioner I) explained to the judge setting recapitulation Bekasi Election ballot invalid. Candidate no. 4 Rahmat Efendi and Ahmad Syaiku gain voice through unlawful means, or at least preceded by acts of abuse of authority possessed Respondent.

"Both individually and collectively with the candidate number 4, which has been categorized as a serious offense is structured, systematic and massive influence voting results and a favorable candidate number 4 and otherwise harm the candidates," explained Petitioner I. 

According to Petitioner I, the results of the voting and counting were conducted KPPS resulting from the election process as opposed to the principle of election. Therefore tally candidate number 4 and set the Respondent as elected partner, not a form of aspiration and people’s sovereignty which implemented honest and fair.

"For example, there is money politics, the division of basic foods, involvement and mobilization of civil servants to winning candidate no. 4. Also found double voters and various other fraud, "said I. Petitioner

Meanwhile Couple Dadang Mulyadi and Lukman Hakim (II Petitioner), to object among other omissions regarding the Respondent is not verified in the establishment candidate mayor and deputy mayor of the city of Bekasi 2012. In this case the candidate no. 4 which mentions only has one wife.

"The question turns out to have more than one wife. Thus, Respondent has clearly let the public lies by candidate number 4, especially on behalf of mayoral candidate named Rahmat Effendi," said Petitioner II.

Another thing is the mind Petitioner II, Respondent has conducted fraud and manipulation of voter lists injure the principles of democracy and elections to be honest and fair with a variety of ways, such as cheating Potential Voters Population List (DP4) a list Voters While (DPS) to a list Voter (DPT). "With the mode selector name in double DPT, the DPT name with the same address and so on," said Petitioner II.

Next, according to Petitioner II, Respondent issued a decree on Procedures for Data Updates and Voter Registration Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Bekasi 2012.

"Stages of data updating voter population census was conducted by potential voters from the government, which is far from perfect. After investigation, there are allegations of multiple names and had died and had moved residence in the DP4," said Petitioner II. (Nano Tresna Arfana / mh)