The Constitutional Court rejected the election result disputes raised by regional head of Candidate Regent and Vice Regent Number 1 Brebes, Agung Widyantoro-Athoillah. In Case No. 77/PHPU.DX/2012, the Court stated that the petition is groundless law.

"Rejecting the petition for all," said Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, Moh. Mahfud MD, the verdict reading session, Wednesday (7/11) afternoon, at the Plenary Court Courtroom. In other words, through this decision, the Court affirmed the victory of Elected Candidate Idza Priyanti - Narjo.

"Court is not convinced there is enough evidence that neither Respondent nor the Related Party have done violations structured, systematic and massive which can significantly affect the ranking of the vote each candidate. Therefore, all of Petitioner a quo is not unreasonable under the law," said Hamdan Zoelva.

Against Petitioners’ argument that states Idza Priyanti has involved two siblings who once served as Mayor Tegal and Vice Regent Pemalang to become interpreters’ campaign without a license from the Governor of Central Java, the Court holds, the argument is not proven.

"Petitioner, if true, there is not enough evidence to convince the Court that the presence of the two officials could inhibit, reduce, or at least influence the freedom of voters to make their choice can result in significant voting ranked applicant and the Related Parties." wrote the Court in the judgment as thick as 198 pages. "Therefore, according to the Court, Petitioner a quo must be presumed unreasonable."

Associated with the violation of the principle of accountability, professionalism, and the rule of law as passed documents Graduate Certificate Learning (STTB) General High School (SMA) PGRI Tegal as Vice Regent Candidate administrative requirements of Narjo (Related Party) who’s discredited by the Petitioner, the Court, is also unfounded.

Court found, Brebes Election Commission (Respondent), has been verified in accordance with the laws and regulations on the terms of the Related Party as a candidate education Regent and Vice Regent. As for the things concerning the validity of diplomas, said the Court, is not under the authority of the Court to vote because it is not directly related to the vote.

"It is the authority of law enforcement agencies to follow up if it found any falsification of the documents in question and the authority of the judiciary to judge others, so that if it is proven so it will be related to his position as Vice Regent," said the Court. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)