The trial continued settlement of election results of Paniai district was held back by the Constitutional Court (MK) on Tuesday (6/11) at the Plenary Court. The case was registered in five cases No. 78, 79, 80, 81, 82/PHPU.D-X/2012.

In the trial to proof of the applicant, which is the beginning of the Applicant prospective partner, namely 78, 80, 81, 82/PHPU.DX/2012? Petitioner’s attorney revealed 78/PHPU.DX/2012 No. Respondent did not verify the correct letter and registration requirements of the Applicant. "All letters submitted is not verified as a whole. The applicant submitted additional 8303 support voice, but by the Respondent only verified number 1500 support, the rest is not verified. The reason, the Commission alleges Paniai village head’s signature is false. To that end, the village chief of the Election Commission visited five villages in Paniai regency to clarify, but not taken by the Respondent. Of the five villages there are 6 thousand votes," said Heru Widodo as attorney Julius Kayame and Haam Nawipa (Petitioner 79/PHPU.DX/2012).

It is also revealed by Juhari as legal counsel to prospective candidates; Yosafat Nawipa and Bartholomeus Yogi, Martinus Yogi and Mathias Mabi Gobay, and Willem Y. Keiya and Yohan Yaimo (Petitioner 80/PHPU.DX/2012). According to Juhari, Paniai Election Commission as Respondent did not clarify properly. "On 4 April 2012, the Respondent announced who escaped, but the applicant did not qualify. We also do the correspondence to the Respondent and the Election Supervisory Committee, but received no response from the Respondent. Verification is not done properly," he explained.

Petitioner’s attorney No. 81/PHPU.DX/2012 also explained that the registration file was not verified by the Respondent. According to Jan Sulwan Saragih, he claimed that candidate Lukas Yeimo and Olean Gobay get support 22,019 votes. "We had 22,019 votes. But we did not qualify. We questioned the Respondent; he said there is no support for that much. Files we were impressed by the Applicant omitted. In the trial we asked where our files, why not verified by the Respondent," he explained.

Respondent’s attorney Aris bongga Salu denied everything revealed by the Petitioners. Aris said it had made a clarification in accordance with existing rules. "The applicant has been verified and no official report. Associated with support, after being verified to the districts, The PPD declared sound is used up for other couples. Then, KTP filed by the name of the picture is different. There is a male name, but the photo of the woman, and vice versa," he said.

At the hearing, Petitioner filed a witness 79/PHPU.dX/2012 number that shows fraud in the vote count. One witness, Darius Nawipa, explained the process of voting in the ballot and the ballots were invalid. According to Darius, 9219 listed in the recapitulation voice vote. "In Ekadide District, the vote, which is to pair number 1 by 131 votes, couple number 2 by 10 votes, couple number 3 as the voice 1413, the pair number 4 of 900 votes, couple number 5 and 6 by 6 votes , and the pair number 7 of 1874 votes. More number of 4000 as agreed ballot religious, customary and property will be given to the couple number three," he explained.

Constitutional judges chaired by the Deputy Chief Justice Ahmad Sodiki were accompanied by Harjono and Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi. The petitioners of this case are Petitioner 78 Yan Tebay and Marselus Takege, Petitioner 79 Yulius Kayame and Haam Nawipa, Petitioner 80 Yosafat Nawipa, Bartholomeus Yogi, Martinus Yogi Mathias Mabi Gobay, Willem Y. Keiya and Yohan Yaimo, Petitioner 81 Lukas Yeimo and Olean Gobay as well as Petitioner 82, Marius Yeimo and Anselmus Petrus Youw. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh/Yazid.tr)