The trial continued settlement election results of Paniai district head held back the Constitutional Court (MK) on Monday (5/11) at the Plenary Court. The case was registered in five cases No. 78, 79, 80, 81, 82/PHPU.D-X/2012.

In the trial to hear the Respondent and the Related Parties, Paniai District Election Commission attorney Aris Bongga Salu mention any exception for Petitioner Respondent 78, 80, 81, 82/PHPU.DX/2012 associated with the Applicant which is a prospective mate mayor and deputy mayor of Paniai District. "The applicant is not a prospect and a potential mate. In addition, the Administrative Court ruling related to Jayapura, The Respondent has filed an appeal to the Supreme Court that the decision of the Administrative Court of Jayapura was not yet legally binding. In addition, Respondent judge the applicant does not have legal standing so that the applicant requests obscure (obscuur libel)," he said before the Constitutional Council, chaired by the Deputy Chief Justice Ahmad Sodiki accompanied by Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi and Harjono.

While the petition No. 79/PHPU.D-IX/2012, 1169 Respondent explained that voice mentioned disqualified by the Respondent. Indeed, continued Aris, Respondent did calculations based on counting recapitulation presented in a plenary session KPU Paniai. "So, instead of Chairman of Paniai Election Commission who disqualified a voice," he explained.

Related parties are represented by legal counsel of Judah Gobay explain the same thing with the verdict Jayapura Respondent answers that do not have legal force. While the request for 79/PHPU.DX/2012 Number, Related Party expressed objection to the ballot propositions argued by the applicant is a recapitulation Ikadide District.

In the trial also presented eleven witnesses of the Petitioner No. 79/PHPU.D/2012 which describes the loss of 1171 votes in District Ekadide. One witness Petitioner, Frans Tegasi Chairman PPD of Ekadide District, confirmed the exclusion of the votes that much in the recapitulation of vote counting Ekadide District. "On 12, I called the secretary with the Commission. Arriving at the office of the District Election Commission that allowed me, the other outside. In the Commission’s office I was forced to reduce the noise. Chairman of the Commission say than my disqualification, you better reduce noise as much as 1171 votes. I told stripped and signature, "he explained.

It is also revealed by Mauritius as witness Candidate Number 5. Mauritius reveals the exclusion of a number of votes in the district. "There is a noise reduction 1171. Witness number 3 insistent revealed that PPD Chairman Ikadide village called KPU chairman Ekadide to change the recapitulation, "he explained.

The applicant’s case, the Petitioner Case No. 78 Yan Tebay and Marselus Takege, Petitioner 79 Yulius Kayame and Haam Nawipa, Petitioner 80 Yosafat Nawipa, Bartholomeus Yogi, Martinus Yogi Mathias Mabi Gobay, Willem Y. Keiya and Yohan Yaimo, Petitioner 8 Lukas Yeimo and Olean Gobay as well as Petitioner 82, Marius Yeimo and Anselmus Petrus Youw. The next hearing will be held on Tuesday, November 6, 2012 at 14:00 pm. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh/Yazid.tr)