Team Coordinator on reviewing Application of the Law on Legal Aid Dominggus Mauritius Luitnan said it has revised request the advice of the judge. "We've improved," he told the panel that consists of the Constitutional Court Anwar Usman (Panel Chair), Achmad Sodiki and Harjono, Wednesday (10/10) at the Panel Session.

Dominggus explained, has added a touchstone in the repair request, namely Article 24 paragraph (3) and Article 28J paragraph (2) of the Constitution of 1945. "Later in the injunction also we fix it," he said.

In addition, he revealed that he also questioned the presence of professors and law students. Therefore, it has been detrimental to his constitutional rights as an advocate. "The lecturers were legal under the Legal Aid Act there is no code of ethics. While the Advocate Law all has their code of ethics, "he said.

Another problem, he continued, the government and the Supreme Court is not authorized to define standards of legal aid organizations. "As per the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 67 of 2005, "he said.

After listening to subjects such improvements, Chief of Panel Anwar Usman adopted the evidence submitted by the applicant. Anwar Usman also said there is a Related Party petition in this case of the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation. The applicant was then expressed its objections to the request. Finally, Anwar stated that the objection will be considered by the Court in the Consultative Meeting.

The provisions are tested by the applicant in Case No. 88/PUU-X/2012 This is Article 1 paragraph (1), subsection (3), subsection (5), and paragraph (6), Article 4 paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), and Article 6 paragraph (2 ) and (3) letter a, letter b, Article 7, Article 8, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) letter a, letter b, Article 9, Article 10, paragraphs a and c, Article 11, Article 15 paragraph (5 ), Article 22 of Law no. 16 Year 2011 on Legal Aid. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)