Cimahi Election Result was announced on 13 September 2012 and then sued to the Constitutional Court (MK) by three pairs of candidates. The first hearing was held disputed Election Court on Friday (28/9) in the Court Building.

Requests were registered in two cases, and the number 61/PHPU.DX/2012 this 62/PHPU.DX/2012, filed by Gantira Kusumah - Bambang Suprihatin (Number 1), Cecelia Rustandi - Eman Sulaeman (Number 4), and Supriyadi - Encep Saepulloh (Number 2).

Through their attorney Aware ploy and Fatmawati, Petitioner objected to Decision No. 61/PHPU.DX/2012 General Elections Commission (KPU) No. Cimahi. 22 Year 2012 on Determination Result Count Recapitulation Legal in the General Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor Cimahi 2012. Fatmawati identifies that the Respondent (KPU Cimahi) unprofessional and negligent in carrying Cimahi Election Year 2012 to the detriment of the Applicant and the Respondent to couples No partisanship. Sort 3. "In Cimahi Election process, there are violations by the Respondent, the mayor and the Related Parties. Mayor to support one candidate, that candidate elected, namely Atty Suharty sister was wife of the Mayor of Erode Itoc Tochija in power in Cimahi period 2007-2012. Respondent Atty Suharty passed the test when keseha," he explained.

Meanwhile, the number 62/PHPU.DX/2012 attorney, R. Wisdom Prihadi, argued the same thing, but with the addition of the mobilization of civil arguments made by the mayor. Then, Respondent unprofessional and sets DPT twice. "Then, the Respondent fails because the distribution of a letter of invitation by PKK. Not only that, the Mayor take the lead by winning effort at RT as number 3.

Based on the above arguments of the petition, the Petitioner asked the Constitutional Council to declare null and void Decision General Elections Commission (KPU) No. Cimahi. 22 of 2012. As well mendiskualfikasi pair number 3, that Atty Suharty - Sudiarto disqualified as a participant," he said.

Constitutional judges, chaired by the Deputy Chairman of the Constitutional Court, accompanied by Justice and Constitutional Harjono Fadlil Ahmad Sumadi give an opportunity to the Respondent and the Party concerned to answer all the arguments expressed by the Petitioners. "The applicant must also prepare evidence and witnesses for the next hearing. The part that should be answered by the Respondent answered differently by Related Parties," explained Sodiki.

The trial heard the answer to the Respondent and Related Party held on October 1, 2012 at 13:00 pm. Not only that, the next hearing will also hear witnesses from the applicant. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh/Yazid.tr)