The Constitutional Court has decided the final voting in the General Election Puncak Jaya regency, Papua. As a result, Candidate Number 2, Henok Ibo and Justus Wonda gets the most votes in the General Election 2012 Puncak Jaya. Court has stated, gaining as much as 71 990 pair voice. The gains outperformed the other two candidates.

Similarly, it is stated in the Constitutional Court Decision No. amar. 39/PHPU.DX/2012 the dbacakan on Wednesday (26/9) at the Plenary Court. For the two other candidates, namely Candidate Number 1 Sendius Wonda and Yorin Karoba received 8385 votes as votes, while Candidate Number 3 Agus Kogoya and Yakob Enumbi obtained 61,231 votes.

Decision, the Court said, was obtained after reviewing all the facts and the court examined the evidence presented by the parties. "The Court continued the trial opened on Monday, September 10, 2012, to hear the report of the Respondent, the General Election Commission of Papua province, the Central Election Commission, Panwaslu Puncak Jaya regency, Bawaslu and Puncak Jaya police chief," said the Court in its legal considerations.

Based on the facts at trial, the Court believes the agreement with six Mewoluk District village chiefs, traditional leaders / community leaders, women, and youth leaders who have been officially appointed by the respective villages from 27 polling stations to represent the throw / deliver voice on August 6, 2012 the agreement was purely Mewoluk District to determine the number of votes each candidate. "The deal is done according to the prevalent custom made by local people, particularly in relation to the election," said the Court.

The objection related to the Applicant (No. couples. Sort 3), according to the Court, the argument was not substantiated by the evidence convincing. "The Court did not find convincing evidence that the Related Party has really brings out the masses of Mewoluk District voting as much as 14,394 votes to Related Parties carrying plywood counter," said the Court.

In addition, according to the Court, the evidence of the vote indicated on plywood questionable validity because the evidence does not prove triplex other evidence according to the law. "Thus, based on the assessments and the legal facts, the Court objected Candidate Number 3 is not unreasonable under the law," said the Court.

However, the Court continued, regardless of the legal considerations in the decision, the alleged criminal matter the election and other violations, still do other remedy under the legislation in force. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)