Case disputes election results of Kendari regional head cannot be accepted by the Constitutional Court, Monday (6/8) at the Plenary Session of the Constitutional Court Room. Court concluded the second petition the wrong object. "The object of the petition is incorrect (error in objecto)," said Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court, Moh. Mahfud MD reading the conclusion of Case 53/PHPU.D-X/2012 and 54/PHPU.D-X/2012.

According to the Court, the applicant should sue the KPU Decree No. Kendari 53/Kpts/KPU-Kota-027.433068/VII/2012 dated July 9, 2012 concerning the Stipulation of Vote Count Recapitulation Result Ratification Election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Turkey In 2012, instead of the Minutes Summary of Results Counting of Votes General Election of Regional Head and Deputy Head of Kendari number 53/Kpts/KPU-Kota-027.433068/VII/2012, dated July 10, 2012 as proposed by the Applicant.

That, said the Court, pursuant to Article 4 of the Constitutional Court Regulation Number 15 Year 2008 on Guidelines for examining disputes the Regional Head General Election results.

"Considering that the presence of Case Repair Joint Petition dated July 25, 2012, then the arguments of the Petitioners a quo is the same as the arguments of the petition 53/PHPU.DX/2012. Thus, according to the Supreme Court on any judgment of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 53/PHPU.DX/2012, dated August 6, 2012, shall also apply mutatis mutandis to this case, "wrote the Court in Decision No. 54/PHPU.D-X/2012.

Finally, the Court asserts, because the object of any petition, the legal status (legal standing), a grace period for submission of the petition, and the principal did not consider the petition.

The petition was filed by Candidate Mayor and Deputy Mayor of the City Kendari Number 5 Tony Herbiansyah-Yani Kasim Marewa and Candidate Mayor and Deputy Mayor Number 1 La Ode Muh. Maghribi-Rachman Siswanto Latjinta. (Dodi / mh/Yazid.tr)