Implementation of the Voting Birthday (PSU) in Pati District Election Year 2012, in the process assessed by the Petitioners been many violations. Applicant to prove on appeal by presenting a number of witnesses in the trial led by Achmad Sodiki (chairman), Harjono, and Ahmad Fadili Sumadi, Tuesday (17/7) afternoon, at the Plenary Meeting Room of the Constitutional Court (MK).

For example, Petitioners witness 45/PHPU.DX/2012, Jaelan from Gunungwungkal district stating that letter of his rights to be purchased by Supar as Chairman of KPPS and successful team No. 5 before the polling ballots. "Pak Supar bought my letter to vote," he explained. For the incident, Jaelan continued, he did not have the right to vote again because once purchased voice mail, voice mail is given to someone else named Kemang.

Not enough of it. Another witness Suyoto, also said the violations that occurred prior to the polling place ballots. According to witnesses from the village of Kali Bats district. Tayu, he was visited by a team of partner No success. Sort 5. Then the person giving the envelope containing the money, amounting to approximately 121 envelopes. The campaign team asked him to give the envelope to the citizens of Kalon time. "I brought 121 envelopes to be distributed to residents around here," he said.

Then the home team success, continued Suyoto, he immediately went to the citizens and give the envelope. However, due to the time it was Election Day, so residents have to go to polling (TPS). "I went to them (in TPS) to give the envelope. With notes, No need to choose candidates. 5," he said in the trial.

In addition to case No. Candidates proposed 45/PHPU.DX/2012 Regent and Vice Regent of Regency. Imam Suroso Pati-Sujoko, this lawsuit was also filed by the other spouse. They are a pair Slamet Warsito-Sri Mulyani (44/PHPU.DX/2012 case), the pair H. Sri Merditomo-H. Karsidi (46/PHPU.DX/2012 case), Sri Susahid-Hasan (47/PHPU.DX/2012 case), and Hj. Kartina Sukawati-H. Supeno (48/PHPU.D-X/2012 case).

District General Election. Under Rule Pati

While the Related Parties is the pair-Budiyono Haryanto (No. 5) and the Respondent in these proceedings is the General Elections Commission (KPU) Pati Regency. On this occasion, the Respondent presented one witness, Teguh Purnomo PPRA as Prov. Central Java. In his statement, saying that the process of recapitulation True ballots conducted in Pati Regency has been considered in accordance with statutory regulations.

But after ballot recapitulation otherwise created, continued True, there are some parties who provide feedback or objections related to the recapitulation process that occurs at the district level. For instance, witness No. 1 does not sign for the card ballots invalid. Then the witness said, "we met at the Constitutional Court," said Teguh imitating the witness statement.

After listening to testimony from a number of parties, both of the Petitioners, the Respondent and the Related Parties, the Parties were asked to draw a conclusion from all the results of this trial. "The conclusion would be on Wednesday, July 18, 2012, at 14:00 pm. If it does not give up on the 14:00 o’clock, mean (counts) did not submit the conclusion," said Sodiki when ending the trial. (Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)