---

 

District Election Results of Central Aceh, Aceh province in 2012 assessed full terms and manipulation. In this case, it looked very much the cooperation between the Independent Election Commission (KIP) District of Central Aceh with the incumbent candidate Nasaruddin and Khairul Asmara. Departing from such a case, on Wednesday (30/5), the Petitioners do with the lawsuit to the Constitutional Court case Number 37/PHPU.DX/2012.

The petitioners in this proceeding are Iklil Ilyas Leube and Muhammad Ridwan as Petitioner I (No. 7), and Mahreje Lisma Wahab and Nasri as Petitioner II (No. 11) and Muslim Ibrahim and Azzama as Petitioner III (No 5). While the Respondent is KIP of North Aceh district and the Related Parties are Nasaruddin and Khairul Asmara (No. 10).

In the petition, the Petitioners say that the Respondent had a close relationship with the Related Parties or applicable not neutral in organizing the General Election. "It thus upheld the district ketidaknetralan KIP Chairman. Hamida Central Aceh," said the petition. According to them, Chairman of the KIP once appointed as Nasaruddin attorney, in a case of Dispute Election Results of 2006.

Not enough of it, says the petition, Hamida in the period 2007-2013 has been the chairman of the Freedom District of Central Aceh. Unfortunately, he also remains a power law Nasaruddin as regent. It thus proved in 2008, he became attorney Nasaruddin in defamation cases. Unneutrality does not stop at the head of KIP kab. Central Aceh.According to the applicant, a member of the KIP is also not neutral. He is still Hasbullah a datu or blood relationship with Nasaruddin. "The customs of the people of Central Aceh, a datu was thought that should help each other in every case (problem)," explained the Petitioners.

In addition, the Respondent also clearly acted in a neutral, discriminative, and acted beyond its authority, and defending the interests of Related Parties. For instance, on March 31, 2012 the Applicant to use photo / attribute one candidate Governor and Vice Governor of Aceh reprimanded by the Respondent, but when the stars. Sort 10 uses the same attributes no warning.

After the trial, one attorney of Applicant Bambang A. said that the Respondent and the Related Parties work together to fight the rule of law. As they have done before the General Election of village expansion, do practices Politics Money (money politics), and moving the apparatus of government in the District. Central Aceh.

In addition, according to Bambang, there are in the process of Election Voters List (DPT) or DPT double trouble. "We found 12 000 DPT is problematic, and in fact used to inflate a pair No incumbent vote. Sort 10, "said the attorney after the trial.

Bambang also said that when Election Day all the witnesses except candidate No 10, not given an official report form and recapitulation of the vote. So that the candidate does not know the real number of votes generated during Election Day. Moreover, the Petitioners have also found a forged official report form. "When we wrote about 300 more cases will be proved in this trial," he told reporters.

Therefore, the applicant in his claim or petition asking the Court to overturn the decision of the minutes of KIP of Central Aceh District on the establishment candidate, and disqualify candidates Nasaruddin regent and deputy regent, and Khairul Asmara as regent and deputy regent district of Central Aceh 2007-2012 period.

In the end of the trial, Akil Mochtar said the chairperson, as the Respondent and the Related Parties are not ready to give an answer and response to the petition of the Petitioner, the trial will be postponed on Monday, June 4, 2012, At 15:30 pm with the agenda of the answers and responses from the Respondent and the Related Parties.(Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)

 

---