One more case Dispute over Election Result (PHPU) Regional Head and Deputy Head of Regional Districts in Aceh go to the table a Constitutional Court (MK). This time the case PHPU Regional Head and Deputy Head of Southwest Aceh 2012 that convened for the first time at the Panel Meeting Room, 2nd Floor Court Building, Tuesday (1/5).Applicant’s case that is registered with 23/PHPU.DX/2012 Purnomo, the number 1 candidate Akmal Ibrahim and Lukman.

The trial began as usual with introductions of the parties present at the hearing. 23 The applicant party attended by both candidates, Akmal Ibrahim, Lukman was accompanied by a power law without any. Indeed the trial this time also devoted to the petition filed No.24/PHPU.DX/2012 Adam Solomon and Afdhal Jihad (No. 4). However, no one from the applicant 24 who attended the inaugural session of the Panel is that Chair, Akil Mochtar stated the petition was aborted 24. "It’s not serious. The invitation was delivered but was not present, his request was aborted, "said Akil.

Because it is not accompanied by legal counsel, Akmal Ibrahim expressed his own subjects request it. Akmal said that the Respondent (KIP Aceh Barat) never carry out its obligation to provide a copy of voters list (DPT) to witnesses the pair of candidates, including the Applicant witness. With DPT was not given a copy of the Applicant witness spouse can not do a checklist of DPT to fit the data in the field. As a result, said Akmal, many voters are not known as the villagers in some polling locations are listed on the DPT and can choose.

"Respondent was sent through the KDP district as many as 11 copies of DPT but by the Respondent were asked to return before the voting day, so that we cannot witness checklist DPT," said Akmal.

Still about DPT, Akmal convey, as the day the election was found to differ with the Respondent’s version of the DPT version of the PPS. In fact, Respondent’s version of the DPT accused Akmal frequently changes so it is unknown where the DPT is right and what is false. Because DPT found obscurity, on Election Day found many children under the age of the parent population without number, people who have died, and those who are outside the voting area or represented vote. "Due to the vagueness of DPT, many voters are not known to use the right to vote, while many who already have the right to vote denied choosing a variety of reasons," said Akmal.

Akmal also said that many residents are eligible to vote actually deliberately not given a letter of invitation to vote by the Respondent. No wonder then Akmal found many invitation letters are left in each polling station even Akmal said the letter of invitation that tersisan average number in the hundreds at each polling station. Adding, Akmal believes that the average voter who did not receive an invitation to choose a partner known as a supporter of number 1, i.e., Lukman Akmal.

Turning to the other allegations, Akmal said that it was treated in the form of intimidation and pressure of the threat. The threat is more addressed to the supporters of Akmal-Lukman. "There was a knock on the door at midnight, there was a group of people armed with spears and rencong standing at an intersection, intersection to threaten supporters of the Petitioner," said Akmal. (Yusti Nurul Agustin/mh/Yazid.tr)