Dispute the election results mayor / deputy mayor Sorong West Papua in 2012 proposed Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon, entered the stage of the pronunciation of the verdict. It was stated in the ruling of the Court reject the entire petition Marthinus-Peter. "Amar verdict, judgment, the petition states refused to entirely," said the chairman of the plenary Moh. Mahfud MD reading the verdict no. 15/PHPU.DX/2012, Wednesday (04/25/2012) evening.
Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon argued the General Election Commission (KPU) Sorong (Respondent) has committed an offense at the time of implementation stages of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is by arranging the stage, program and schedule of implementation of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is based on legislation that has been not apply.
According to the Court, Petitioners’ argument is unproven and unreasonable laws. This was after the check and examines the arguments Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon and rebuttal arguments Sorong City Commission and the evidence presented by the parties at the hearing. According to the Court, the Commission has compiled a stage Sorong, program and implementation schedule of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is based on the provisions in force. "The objections filed by the Petitioner has been completed for the stage, but brought back as if the new findings once known who loses and who wins. Therefore, the Court is Petitioners’ argument is unproven and unreasonable law, "said Constitutional Court Justice M. Akil Mochtar when reading the court opinion.
Similarly, Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon’s argument of violations in the preparation of voters list (DPT), money politics by Lamberthus Jitmau-Pahimah Iskandar (Number 3) as the Related Party. According to the Court, a series of facts revealed in the trial, no evidence that the Commission prepared DPT. It was also revealed that the practice of money politics is not only done by Lamberthus Jitmau-Pahimah Iskandar, but also made by Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon
The Court re-opened the plenary session after the break for praying Maghrib. Seven of the Constitutional Court justices were Moh. Mahfud MD (chairman of the plenary), Anwar Usman, Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi, Hamdan Zoelva, Harjono, M. Akil Mochtar, and Muhammad Alim implemented the decision of the hearing the pronunciation of Sorong City Election disputes filed by Hengky-Juni.
Hengky-Juni acquisition postulated that the recapitulation of vote counting conducted by KPU Sorong resulting from improper process is done in a structured, systematic and massive, and contrary to the principles of organizing elections
Court after looking at the petition, answer Sorong City Commission, as well as evidence of the parties, Hengky-Juni cannot prove their argument.
Hengky-Juni’s argument about the violation on the stage of updating the data made Sorong City Commission, the Court, without meaning to justify the existence of the weakness and disorganization in the preparation of DPT, DPT is part of the problem of population problems in Indonesia that cannot be resolved by the Government. So if it cannot be proven legally that the Commission violated DPT Sorong in a structured, systematic and massive favoring one candidate, then shoves the City Commission cannot be burdened with the blame for the chaos in the administration of DPT Election in Sorong. Therefore, according to the Court, the problem of DPT should be a genuine interest for the organizers of the overflow and fair and honest Election. (Rosihin Nur Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)
Dispute the election results mayor / deputy mayor Sorong West Papua in 2012 proposed Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon, entered the stage of the pronunciation of the verdict. It was stated in the ruling of the Court reject the entire petition Marthinus-Peter. "Amar verdict, judgment, the petition states refused to entirely," said the chairman of the plenary Moh. Mahfud MD reading the verdict no. 15/PHPU.DX/2012, Wednesday (04/25/2012) evening.
Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon argued the General Election Commission (KPU) Sorong (Respondent) has committed an offense at the time of implementation stages of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is by arranging the stage, program and schedule of implementation of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is based on legislation that has been not apply.
According to the Court, Petitioners’ argument is unproven and unreasonable laws. This was after the check and examines the arguments Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon and rebuttal arguments Sorong City Commission and the evidence presented by the parties at the hearing. According to the Court, the Commission has compiled a stage Sorong, program and implementation schedule of Sorong City Election Year 2012 is based on the provisions in force. "The objections filed by the Petitioner has been completed for the stage, but brought back as if the new findings once known who loses and who wins. Therefore, the Court is Petitioners’ argument is unproven and unreasonable law, "said Constitutional Court Justice M. Akil Mochtar when reading the court opini
Similarly, Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon’s argument of violations in the preparation of voters list (DPT), money politics by Lamberthus Jitmau-Pahimah Iskandar (Number 3) as the Related Party. According to the Court, a series of facts revealed in the trial, no evidence that the Commission prepared DPT. It was also revealed that the practice of money politics is not only done by Lamberthus Jitmau-Pahimah Iskandar, but also made by Marthinus Salamala-Petrus Fatlolon
The Court re-opened the plenary session after the break for praying Maghrib. Seven of the Constitutional Court justices were Moh. Mahfud MD (chairman of the plenary), Anwar Usman, Ahmad Fadlil Sumadi, Hamdan Zoelva, Harjono, M. Akil Mochtar, and Muhammad Alim implemented the decision of the hearing the pronunciation of Sorong City Election disputes filed by Hengky-Juni.
Hengky-Juni acquisition postulated that the recapitulation of vote counting conducted by KPU Sorong resulting from improper process is done in a structured, systematic and massive, and contrary to the principles of organizing elections
Court after looking at the petition, answer Sorong City Commission, as well as evidence of the parties, Hengky-Juni cannot prove their argument.
Hengky-Juni’s argument about the violation on the stage of updating the data made Sorong City Commission, the Court, without meaning to justify the existence of the weakness and disorganization in the preparation of DPT, DPT is part of the problem of population problems in Indonesia that cannot be resolved by the Government. So if it cannot be proven legally that the Commission violated DPT Sorong in a structured, systematic and massive favoring one candidate, then shoves the City Commission cannot be burdened with the blame for the chaos in the administration of DPT Election in Sorong. Therefore, according to the Court, the problem of DPT should be a genuine interest for the organizers of the overflow and fair and honest Election. (Rosihin Nur Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)
Wednesday, April 25, 2012 | 21:08 WIB 186