H.A. Wattiheluw and Halattu Roy are the applicant of PHPU Central Maluku District Case 2012 - Case No. 17/PHPU. DX/2012 - among others raised objections to the Minutes of the Recapitulation of Vote Count Results 2012 Election Central Maluku, and Central Maluku Regency Decree on the determination of the Candidate Elected Regent and Vice Regent of Central Maluku Election Period for Second Round of 2012-2017 established on 12 April 2012. Similarly, the Applicant submitted a preliminary hearing on Tuesday (24/4) pm in Meeting Room of the Constitutional Court.

According to the applicant, the establishment of Vote Count Result Recapitulation of Central Maluku Election 2012 Candidate Elected and determination made by the Respondent (Central Maluku Regency), resulting from a defective process of Election law and contrary to the principle of election is ‘overflowing’. "The voice of the obtained candidate number 1 and number 4 is set by the Respondent as the winner of the second round, not a reflection of the aspirations and sovereignty of the people are genuine," said the Applicant. 

The applicant argued, Central Maluku Election 2012 met a lot of abuse and fraud as a breach of massive, systematic, and structured. Based on legal facts obtained Petitioners, there is sufficient evidence and evidence that the violations were not a stand-alone offense, but has been linked to one another. "Therefore, we appeal to the Constitutional Court to declare the Minutes of the Recapitulation of Vote Count Result of Central Maluku Election 2012 is null and void. In addition we ask the Constitutional Court ordered the Respondent to vote again on the whole of Central Maluku regency with a partner involving our candidates and representatives of the Central Maluku district 2012-2017, "explained the applicant at length.

Petitioner also argued that the coalition has supported a number of parties, including the National Front Party (Barnas), PPIB, GN, PSI, and PPI. However, Central Maluku Regency Letter No. 15/KPU-Kab. 029.433639/II/2012 dated February 21, 2012, which declared 13 political parties nominating petition carrying the problem with the management there is a dualism or the dual support PKNU, Barnas, PPIB, Pioneer, PPI, PPPI, Sovereignty, Buru, PNIM, PPNUI, PSI, PIS, and PMB. "The Commission did not include PPDI Party and PDP," explained the Petitioner to the Council of Judges.

Based on legal grounds that the applicant submitted, the applicant appealed to the Court to give judgment by injunction, among others, to grant the petition in its entirety; declared null and void and not legally binding, Central Maluku Regency KPU Decree on Establishment of Regional Head Candidate and Deputy Head of the Central Maluku Election 2012; declared null and void and legally flawed, and not legally binding, the implementation of voting and counting in Central Maluku Election 2012. (Nano Tresna Arfana / mh/Yazid.tr)