Election Commission of Regency Jakarta West Java in 2012 (Respondent), in proceedings in the Constitutional Court (MK) stated that the arguments of the Petitioners who accused the implementation of the Election District. Jakarta has proceeded in a non-democratic, and violations are structured, massive, and systematic, Even so it is not unreasonable and not based on valid evidence by law.

"Therefore, it is reasonable for the applicant to cancel the (petition)," said Attorney Naupal Alrasyid Respondent, while providing answers to the Petitioners' argument on Thursday (29/3). This trial is a matter of Dispute Election Results (PHPU) filed by Sa'duddin and Jamal Lulail (No spouse. Sort 2), which is registered with no. 9/PHPU.DX/2012, and Darip Mulyana and Jejen Sayuti (No 3), which is registered no. 10/PHPU.D-X/2012.

Other charges are also answered by the Respondent is KPPS (Group Organizer Voting) has made the voter card in the name of a toddler. In such cases, the Respondent says that this is not true, because the argument was not substantiated. "Since the Respondent has compiled a list of voters by Election Commission regulations," explained Naupal.

Moreover, the Respondent also denies blocking the voters lost their right to vote as the applicant alleged. According to the Respondent, so it is not true, because what is argued by the Petitioners did not eliminate the rights of voters."Voters are numbered as many as 237 people have enrolled in the DPT (voters list)," Respondent's attorney said.

In addition to Applicant No answer charges. 9, the Respondent also denied all allegations of the Petitioner No. 10. One is the socialization of the vision and mission pamphlets candidates’ regent and deputy regent, and that the applicant is very detrimental. Respondent said that the pamphlet was revised and distributed by the Respondent. "So this issue is considered completed, and this was accepted by the applicant as repair flyers," he explained.

On the same occasion, it also heard an answer from the stars of the Related Parties. Sort 1, Neneng Hasanah Yasin and Rohim Mintareja. Through the Power of Attorney statute, Alexander S. said that if the scrutiny of the evidence available to the applicant, there is approximately 83 reports or cases of abuse. "But the report was made after determination of the KPU (General Elections Commission of the Regional District of Bekasi), May 16 and March 17," he explained.

That is, Iskandar added that the report submitted to the Election Supervisory Committee of Bekasi Regency 2012 involving as many as 83 cases, does not have the force of law. "Because it's expired," he explained.

Then need to be observed, continued Alexander, who had reported cases are collected by collectors of information, or not a person who commits an offense."So the report, but time has not passed, nor does it qualify as an incident witness report," he said. (Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)