Two of the three pairs of Candidate Regent and Vice Regent of West Java, Jakarta apply Election Dispute case (PHPU) to the Constitutional Court. Mareka is Sa'duddin and Jamal Lulail (No. Sort 2), which is registered with the stars.9/PHPU.DX/2012, and Darip Mulyana and Jejen Sayuti (No. Sort 3), which is registered with the stars. 10/PHPU.D-X/2012.

On Wednesday (28/3), the trial began and the first exposure presented by the Petitioner No.. 9. Represented by legal counsel, the applicant said that the process of implementation of the Election of Bekasi district of 2012 has proceeded in a dishonest and unfair, which is characterized by the presence of various forms of cheating that are structured, systematic and massive made by the Respondent, the District Election Commission of Bekasi and Related Parties Neneng Hasanah Yasin and Rohim Mintareja.

"Such violations are not a violation of its own, but is linked to one another, conducted by the Respondent," explained attorney of Applicant No. 9, Sadar Muslimat, before the Constitutional Assembly.

Then Petitioner also argues that the Tender. Jakarta has committed an offense, where they are not neutral by replacing members who do not support the couple KPPS No. Sort 1. "Then the money politics that is structured, systematic and massive stars that performed by the couple. 

Accordingly, continued Sadar, Petitioners ask the Court to grant an objection, and declared invalid and not binding on Tender Decision. Jakarta in 2012 Recapitulation of Vote Count, dated March 15, 2012.

The same thing also requested by the Petitioner No.. 10. They postulated that the recapitulation of the vote in the Election District. Jakarta in 2012 should be declared invalid by the law. "As a partner No 1 is done by breaking the law, or at least have violated the principles of election, " said Arkan Cikwan as the attorney of Applicant No. 10.

More than that, said Arkan, the Petitioner also find a variety of fraud committed by the Respondent, but cheating is allowed by them. "The actions of the Respondent have violated the oath or affirmation," he said.

Respondent, said Arkan, is also considered to be very detrimental to Petitioner, because the vision and mission of socialization pamphlet candidate and vice-regent and regent, the Respondent intentionally did not include a curriculum vitae No spouse. Sort 3. "Whereas it is the track record is very important to be known by the public," he said.

Therefore, the applicant requested that the states accept this verdict and granted the petition. "Canceling the minutes of recapitulation of votes Election District.Jakarta in 2012, and ordered the District Election Commission. Bekasi carry out re-election vote for the entire Jakarta districts in 2012 with No.  2 and 3," he said.

To allow the Respondent and the Related Parties make the answer to a lawsuit by the Petitioners, as the chairperson Akil Mochtar said the trial was postponed tomorrow (Thursday, 29/3), at 15.00 pm. "The delay is to give opportunity to the Respondent and the Related Party to respond to the Petition the Petitioner," explained Akil.

Akil the end of the trial also asked about the number of witnesses who wish to be presented from each party in the hearing of evidence. In their statement, the Petitioner No. 9, will bring about 30 witnesses, while the stars. 10, will bring about 100 witnesses. While the Respondent and the Related Parties, each will present 20 witnesses. (Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)