General Elections Commission (KPU), Jepara as the Respondent, through his legal counsel, Abhan, stating, Jepara Election 2012 has been implemented in accordance with applicable regulations to adhere to the principles and the principles of election administration which is honest, fair and democratic. Implementation of Jepara Election safe and orderly progress with the increased voter turnout that is equal to 65.27%, when compared to the previous General Election in 2007 in the amount of 55.07%.
Abhan couples denied the petition proposition Nur-Aris Yahman Isnandar (Nuranis), the difference in votes. Abhan also assesses the application obscure (obscuur libel), because Nuranis not show clearly on where the violation occurred, who did it, and when the violation.
While in the principal case, KPU Jepara denied Petitioner’s argument regarding the printing of ballots exceeds the demand. KPU Jepara acknowledged that the partners took the initiative to print ballots exceeds the order KPU Jepara. To avoid a libel action, the Commission held two meetings Jepara coordination. At a meeting held January 19, 2012, located in Jepara Election Commission Office, do the sealing of ballot papers. The event was attended by various stakeholders, among others, the three candidates’ campaign teams, Jepara parliament, government, Panwaslukada, Police, Kodim, Kajati.
"Thus, it is certain; there is no excess beyond the provision of ballot papers. The presence of the remaining ballot papers printed in anticipation of a partner to request a replacement ballot probably damaged or defective has been secured properly and not affect the voting and counting process. "
As stated Abhan KPU Jepara as legal counsel in the trial of the dispute case Number 5/PHPU.DX/2012 District Election results. Jepara, which was held at the Constitutional Court on Thursday (23/2/20012). The trial of the agenda to listen to answers KPU Jepara (Respondent), a description pair-Subroto Marzuqi Ahmad as the Related Party, and heard the testimony of witnesses, conducted by a panel of judges Achmad Sodiki constitution as chair of the panel, accompanied by two members of the panel, Harjono and Anwar Usman. The trial was attended by Nur Yahman (Applicant) was accompanied by his power, Heru widodo et al. Respondent parties present the Chairman of KPU Jepara, Muslim Aisha and his staff, a member of the Commission of Central Java Province, and was accompanied by his power, Abhan.
Umar also denied further arguments regarding the lack of a partner Nuranis ballots in some districts. Strengthen the rebuttal; Umar data presented in all polling stations the ballot as the number of Jepara regency 821 555 votes. "The voters who use their voting rights number 538 739," said Umar.
Meanwhile, the couple Mabrur through his legal counsel, Umar Ma’ruf, dismissed the arguments of Petitioner and regard it as a mere issue. For example, the issue of a study in Jepara Regency Hall, SD knocking campaign in the yard, a letter of invitation that is not intentionally distributed, and the issue of distribution of basic food in the two sub Kalinyamatan and Mayong. "The issue is obviously not the case and by itself is not proven," said Umar.
Umar also consider Petitioner’s argument regarding the event Silaturrahim Society of Civil Village (PPD), which was attended Mabrur partner, is an exaggerated depiction. Mabrur partner, said Omar, addressing only a reasonable invitation of village officials (village head) to talk about the vision and mission of the pair of candidates. In addition, Mabrur never ordered PPD coordinator to create and share invitations to senior officials and village. "Thus, it is not true of the Related Parties are ordered to divide PPD invitations and arrange a meeting of top brass. What happens is, the officials themselves who have the activity, the Related Parties are only trying to honor the invitation is given, "said Umar.
Petitioners’ argument that states are taking KPPS officer at the time of opening of polling stations gave a briefing on the procedure for voting to the voter with instructions to the Java language nek nyoblos, Siji wae ojo loro, telu, opo papat, mangkeh batal"(If vote, just one, not two, three or four, later canceled), the state Mabrur never get information about it.”Speech is argued by the Petitioner is as if to illustrate KPPS siding officer to Related Parties. That this is not true, and moreover, the Related Parties do not have a structural relationship with the organizers of elections in this KPPS, making it impossible ordered to do so, "said Umar Ma’ruf.
This time trial also heard the testimony of witnesses presented by the Petitioner.One witness named Junaidi, Head of the Village District Purwogondo Kalinyamatan, claim to get a letter of invitation from the coordinator of the PPD to gather officials and the devices in the event Jepara Election Silaturrahim and socialization. The event was held in Waterboom Tiara Park, Village Purwogondo and attended his vice regent Subroto deliver material on the economy in Jepara. In the middle of the show, the witnesses claimed to prepare the envelopes for the officials and the present. "At that time I was called by the coordinator to prepare an envelope that will later be given to the Principals and the present," said Junaidi.
To be known, couples Nur-Aris Yahman Isnandar objected to the official report issued by the Respondent that the General Elections Commission (KPU), Jepara 6/BA/II/2012 Number of Vote Count Result Recapitulation Election of Regent and Vice Regent, dated February 4 2012 of 2012. In the attachment to the minutes, the KPU Jepara set of votes for each candidate: Pet-Ahmad Marzuqi Subroto (number 1) obtained 222 213 votes; pair Kaeron Syariefudin-Ahmad Ja’far (number 2) 15 926 votes; partner Nur Yahman -Aris Isnandar (number 3) 189.150 votes and the couple Yuli Nugroho-Din Amin (number 4) 95.699 votes.
According to Heru Widodo, attorney-Aris Isnandar Yahman Nur, the determination of the recapitulation is not legally valid. For vote-mate Ahmad Marzuqi Subroto (Mabrur) obtained through unlawful means, or at least accompanied by a severe misuse of authority by the KPU Jepara either individually or jointly with spouse Mabrur. Heru suggests the occurrence of fraud and serious violations that are structured, systematic and massive, so the favorable vote Mabrur partner. Instead, the couple Nuranis be the most disadvantaged by the actions of fraud and breach. (Rosihin Nur Ana / mh/Yazid.tr)
Thursday, February 23, 2012 | 23:51 WIB 154