---

The Constitutional Court (MK) received verification reports of Isai Wuritimuri- Lukas Angwarmase file candidacy of The West Southeast Maluku Regency (MTB), Monday (13/2). The report is a "result" of the Constitutional Court on interlocutory matters Dispute Election Results (PHPU) the regional head and deputy head of West Southeast Maluku regency on December 23, 2011 last.

 

Chairman of Election Commission of West Southeast Maluku Johana J.J. Lolouan who read the report says the couple not eligible to become party candidates for the period 2011-2012 Regents MTB. "The factual verification and administration carried out with Panwaslu Maluku and at the central level, in the name of Wurtimuri-Angwarmase and declared ineligible to be a participant nomination of Regent and Vice Regent of West Southeast Maluku (MTB) in the period 2011-2012," said Johana before the Constitutional Court Panel chaired by M. Akil Mochtar.

 

In conclusion the results of such verification, Johana also said that the couple do not fix the documents requested by the Parties and the Election Supervisory Committee MTB Commission. "The results of verification made by MTB Regency, Maluku Election Commission, and the Election Supervisory Committee of the document appropriate check list to be repaired, it was not repaired or not repaired by Wurtimuri-Angwarmase," said Johana. The document is not completed among others SKCK (Certificate of Police Notes) and residence certificate.

 

While Chairman Panawaslu MTB, Hengky Serin would say, the Commission is not a professional MTB. That is because the verification schedule is not clear and the Commission put off by the MTB. Hengky also revealed that the coordination between KPU MTB and it runs but occasionally the Commission MTB preaches something sudden.

 

Hengky describes one form of poor coordination between KPU MTB with MTB Panwaslu, "On January 6, defined as the date for candidates to enter the file and should be clarified according to the schedule date January 6 to 11 in Ambon. But we just received a letter dated January 9, 2011 to inform the Supervisory Committee verification will be conducted in Ambon, "said Heng.

 

Later it admitted that he had reprimanded Supervisory Committee. However, a letter of reprimand is not a recommendation but only a letter of reprimand only. Reprimand was filed because the Supervisory Committee questioned why the verification was not done in the MTB course. If done in MTB, any shortcomings when such verification documents that is incomplete may be notified to the relevant parties more quickly. (Yusti Nurul Agustin / mh/Yazid.tr)

---