High school students of PGRI III Bogor visited the Constitutional Court (MK), on Thursday (3/11) afternoon, received directly by the Court Researcher Fajar Laksono Soeroso. The purpose of the visit was to recognize students near the Constitutional Court, which includes knowing the ins and outs of the Constitutional Court Procedural Law, the constitutional judges, as well as view the Court trial, held that a lot of Law and Dispute case the Head of the Regional Election Results.

On that occasion Fajar Laksono Soeroso explain various matters relating to the Constitutional Court. Among other things, the constitution must judge a statesman who mastered the Constitution and the public. Thus, the position of constitutional justice is the only political office which requires statesman.

"In a normative sense is not determined statesman. But statesmen can be defined as those that are no longer thinking about the material, practical political interests, except to serve for the country, "explains Fajar.

Furthermore, said Fajar, MK domiciled in the state capital, in this case in Jakarta. Consequently, the Constitutional Court does not have representation in these areas. The position of this Court is in accordance with the law. But in practice, advanced Fajar, the position of the Constitutional Court in Jakarta still cause trouble.

"The difficulty is what? Work areas throughout Indonesia Constitutional Court, what if someone wants the litigants in the Constitutional Court, whether to come to Jakarta? When it comes to Jakarta, the cost is expensive and takes time, "explained Fajar.

Finally, so that seekers can access the local justice of the Constitutional Court, then this institution building networks, partnerships with a number of universities in Indonesia, especially the Faculty of Law. The Constitutional Court has built video conferencing facilities in universities from 33 provinces in Indonesia.

"That is, those areas that want to litigants in the Constitutional Court, does not have far to come to Jakarta. He can come to a place nearby, which owns a video conferencing facility. For example, the Papuans do not need to come to Jakarta. But it could come to the University of Cendrawasih to conduct hearings remotely via video conferencing, "said Fajar.

Fajar further convey, MK do substantive justice and law enforcement embracing progressive. That is, the Constitutional Court did not interpret the law is merely what is in writing, or that is in the legislation.

"But also, the Constitutional Court must seek justice. Because it can be written rule was not unjust. To the written rule that’s unfair, the Constitutional Court could break through. If the written law hinders the achievement of justice, the Constitutional Court will break through, "Fajar said that the occasion was also explained about the" ultra petita "to students. (Nano Tresna A. / mh/Yazid.tr)