---

Dialogue Meeting on "Increasing Understanding of constitutional, and the Procedural Law of the Constitutional Court," organized by the Constitutional Court (MK) in collaboration with Leimena Institute on 16 to 18 September 2011, at the Hotel Lumire, Jakarta, was officially closed at 11:15 pm by Leimena Institute Leaders, Prof.. Dr. Mangara Tambunan, Sunday (18 / 9).

Attending the closing ceremony, the Plh. Head of Public Relations and Protocol Budi Djohari Achmad, former Constitutional Court Justice Maruarar Siahaan, and also attended a number of Pastors, National Leadership PGI, PGLII, PGPI, as well as hundreds of Christian Secondary School Teachers of the 33 Provinces in Indonesia.

Budi Achmad Djohari, as the representative of the Constitutional Court in his speech that the 1945 Amendment is an important agenda of reforms undertaken this nation. Fundamental changes are made to perfect the organization of state constitutional basis in the past that are less democratic and open opportunities for abuse of power.

Nevertheless, the 1945 Constitution modifier agrees not to make changes to the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution. The opening of the 1945 Constitution contains a full awareness of the foundation and the related idea of establishment of the state of Indonesia, "said Budi.

Budi further explained that in paragraph 4 of the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution stipulated Pancasila as the state of Indonesia. Such provisions, he said, the Indonesian nation has chosen and agreed on Pancasila became the soul of the 1945 Constitution as the founding legal document, and also became the supreme law of the state.

"Nevertheless, the choice of Pancasila is not solely due to the para-4 UUD 1945, as well as Pancasila has agreed to be the book of the law itself," said Budi. He further said, "Pancasila should be interpreted rationally to all citizen attitudes and state behavior, and governed in accordance with the principles and values contained in Pancasila."

Looking at the facts and conditions, Budi said that the agenda is very urgent or urgent for Indonesia nation is sought, and revitalize, and correctly implement what is contained in the values of Pancasila and 1945 Constitution of our own self. Therefore, Budi said, is important in order to raise the collective consciousness that Pancasila is the masterpiece of our founding fathers.

Meanwhile, in his speech Mangara Tambunan said that this Dialogue Meeting with the event can be a milestone appreciation, understanding, and implementation of the constitution as mandated in the 1945 Constitution."Therefore, our great hope could be disseminated to the public, especially to students of constitutional and social life," pleaded Mangara.

Before the closing ceremony, during 3 (three) days of Participants listened to a number of materials from the interviewees, ie the first material submitted by the Constitutional Court Dr. Harjono, SH, M.C.L. In his paper, he describes the RI associated with the state system after the 1945 changes and understands the 1945 Constitution as the elaboration of Pancasila. While the two presenters, Prof.. Dr. Achmad Sodiki., SH, delivered on the Court and the rule of justice in a substantive, as well as a legally progressive. Constitutional justice Dr. Indrati Maria Farida, SH, completes the next speaker. In this regard, he stated in his paper and the authority associated with the Constitutional Court of Law against the 1945 Constitution. Constitutional Justice Dr. H. M. Akil Mochtar, SH, M.H. submit material related to procedural law and case studies Dispute Election Results (PHPU), namely the General Election of President and Vice President, Legislative Elections, and the Regional General Election.

Then the delivery of content in the 5th session of the two judges delivered by the constitution, namely Dr. Muhammad Alim, SH, M. Hum., And Dr. Anwar Usman, S.H, M.H. They convey the procedural law relating to Dissolution of Political Parties and the Dispute Authority of State Institutions. Later in the session to-6 associated with the Authority of Breaking the Law of the People’s Representative Council Opinion on Alleged Violations of Law by the President / Vice President of the Constitutional Court delivered by Dr. Hamdan zoelva, SH, M.H.

And, the last session which was originally submitted by the Secretary-General MK Janedjri M. Gaffar, but because he was unable to attend replaced by Abdul Ghoffar, MK Chief of Staff. On the occasion, in front of hundreds of participants Rally Speech, Ghoffar deliver material on the Constitutional Court: Court towards Excellence. (Shohibul Umam / mh/Yazid.tr)

---