Constitutional Justice M. Akil Mochtar as the spokesman strongly denied the allegation to Former Vice Chairman of Court Abdul Mukthie Fadjar that he involved in election-related fake letters of the Constitutional Court, Tuesday (5/7) in Court Building.

Chairman of Constitutional Court (MK) Moh. Mahfud MD denies the existence of other cases of bogus letters, besides the case of a fake letter that was addressed by the House Elections Committee Mafia and the Police. This rebuttal submitted by Mahfud in a news conference about the alleged fake letter as reported by 16 not elected candidates on Tuesday (5/7).

"Related to the issue of fake letters, I declare that the Court no longer the case of a false letter. Only one case of false letters handled by the House Committee and the Police had come to the title of the case. But lately emerging issues letter issued by Mr. Mukhtie
Fadjar (Former Vice Chairman of the Constitutional Court, ed.). The letter was not bogus. But implementation is not good about the decision of the Court authority and a letter of explanation. But the letter made by Mr. Mukhtie is authentic. There is no conspiracy. There is no mafia. That official agreed in
Consultative Meeting. Here I have to say that the letter was true and official, "said Mahfud.

Add captions Mahfud, Spokesperson M. MK Akil Mochtar also strongly denied the allegation Former Vice Chairman MK Abdul Mukthie Fadjar mafia involved in election-related letter explaining the Constitutional Court regarding the determination of the eight stages of phase III of the seat count. According to Akil, MK numbered 1362/PHPU/2009 Letter dated August 26, 2009 made by Mukthie an official letter of the Constitutional Court to answer the Commission letter dated June 30, 2009. The Court Decision No. 74 -80 - 94-59 - 67 / PHPU.C-VII/2009 filed by PAN, PPP, PKB, Golkar, and Gerindra, the Court gave interpretation of Article 205 paragraph (5), (6), and (7) regarding the determination of the third stage seats. Then, the Court set the stage for the establishment of eight third-stage seats.

"So, this is not about the people (candidates). Against eight stages, the Commission sent a letter June 30, 2009. The letter mentions the need for intensive checks to avoid mistakes. There is concern that the pattern set calculation in accordance with the Election Commission no decision of the Constitutional Court and need confirmation. If possible, have an announcement to the media at the national or local elections. Against the Commission determines that the two models that will defined as the implementation of the decision of the Court. The Court answered by Vice Chairman At that time, Abdul Mukthie Fadjar, through the Court Number 1362/PHPU/2009 Letter dated 26 August 2009, "Akil said.

In a letter sent by the Commission, it questioned the ruling of the Constitutional Court regarding the determination of the eight stages of the third stage in particular seat number 6. Mukthie, according to Akil, replied (in the letter of the Constitutional Court, Ed.) For the application of the numbers 5 and 6 in accordance with the Court's opinion as expressed on page one letter of the Commission to the Court. According to Akil, in the ruling of the Constitutional Court discussed the seat number 5 by mentioning 'Chair phase III results of the calculation should be allocated to electoral districts that still have the rest of the chair'. Meanwhile, the second, the number 6 says 'Candidates for House members who are entitled to seats is the candidate who gets the most votes in the electoral districts that still have the rest of the seats, which are nominated by political parties are entitled to the remaining seats'.

"The question now (the answer) there is at number 3 which states' All the rest of the valid votes of political parties that the sound has not been taken into account in phase I and phase II of the entire sum to the provincial electoral district divided by the number of remaining seats of provincial elections throughout the region that have not allocated for the new BPP figures'. Decisions (Constitutional Court) should be read completely. No one is wrong in this letter (Letter MK) and none of them were forged in this letter, "he explained.

Responding to claims 16 elected candidates are not saying that the Commission sets by virtue of a Constitutional Court, Akil replied fully implementing authority by the Commission, not of the Court. According to Akil, MK authority only up to provide guidance on the interpretation of Article 205 paragraph (5), (6), and (7) regarding the determination of the third stage seats. "That (implementation) is it of no concern to the Court because it (the letter) is in conformity with the Constitutional Court's decision. The issue may or may not be of any concern to the Court. Constitutional Court's decision or a letter from the Court never mentioned names, regions, and a chair who. It does not exist. It must be understood. So, as if Mr. Mukthie it is part of the mafia election with the release of this letter. That's a lie. We reiterate that Mr. Mukthie make the letter on behalf of the Court and decided in a slaughter house before it is answered by Mr. Mukthie.

While the 16 candidates on the request so that the Court issue a letter of recommendation to the House Elections Committee Mafia, Akil refused to make the letter of recommendation. "Those who lost come to me and said it was another take legal action, such as to the administrative court, but lost. Then I say, please report it to the Committee and they said that the Committee was not willing to accept. They requested that the Court make a letter to the Committee that something is impossible because there is no problem. Those who think there is a problem unilaterally, even though the Commission had not been confirmed, " Akil said. (Lulu Anjarsari / mh/Yazid.tr)