Related Party through its legal counsel, Herman Kadir when expressed objection to the arguments of the petition in the trial of Dispute over Election Results (PHPU) Bombana Regency. The agenda was listening to the Respondents Response, Related Party, and verification of Evidence, Monday (30 / 5) at the Panel Court Room of the Constitutional Court Building.
Jakarta, MKOnline - Constitutional Court (MK) held a hearing session of Dispute over Election Result (PHPU) of Bombana District, Southeast Sulawesi, on Monday (30/5). Second session that was held at the 4th floor courtroom of the Constitutional Court Building panel scheduled repairs and hear the answer of the Respondent and Related Parties. Both parties to the case in the court dismissed all allegations Petitioner.
The case is registered with No. 56/PHPU.D-IX/2011. Subhan Tambera-Abdul Aziz Baking proposed the case. At the previous hearing the Petitioner's attorney, Kores Tambunan presents a number of violations is the reason or objection petition against the Election of Bombana. Violations are postulated, are the voice mark of the couple number 2, Tafdil-Masyura Ila Ladamay (Related Party), administrative violations committed by the KPU Bombana, the Chairman of the Commission Bombana alignments to win the Related Party, and the mobilization of forces, intimidation, and practice money politics.
In answer to the Respondent and the Related Party, the arguments Petitioner was denied hard by both. Through their attorneys, the Respondent says Petitioner's arguments are not supported by valid evidence and it seems provocative. In addition, the Respondent also ensures Election of Bombana have been carried out in accordance with prevailing regulations.
The same thing is also said to the Related Parties in answering the above petition. Through their attorneys, the Related Parties declare Election of Bombana was running conducive without any special events. "There is no difference in sound, no bubbling sound. The arguments submitted by the Petitioner are not true. Later we submit valid proof that there is no bubbling sound, "says the Related Party's attorney, Herman Kadir.
Furthermore, other Related Party attorney, Sahrin Hamid said emphatically that it rejected Petitioner's arguments regarding the practice of money politics. If it is found in Tafdil-Masyura Ila Ladamay giving money, it is certainly not to seek public sympathy. "The money spent was for orphans and the poor through charity who become liabilities as a Muslim. It was very naive if Petitioner linking it to money politics "said Sahrin.
Panel Session with Chairman M. Akil Mochtar accompanied by Hamdan Zoelva and Muhammad Alim was then adjourned the hearing at around 17:00 pm. Third trial of this case will be continued tomorrow, Tuesday (31/5) with the agenda of listening to witnesses' petition, the Respondent's witnesses, and witness of the Related Party. (Yusti Nurul Agustina/mh/Yazid)
Tuesday, May 31, 2011 | 06:47 WIB 193