The situation in the Constitutional Court during the announcement reading session for the case No. 24/PUU-IX/2011 about the review of Supreme Court verdict No. 301K/pdt/200 at the Constitutional Court Panel room, Friday (11/3).
Jakarta, MKOnline - The Constitutional Court (The Court) held a session for announcement reading for case number 24/PUU-IX/2011. The Court announced that the review of Supreme Court verdict No. 301K/pdt/200 was not the jurisdiction of The Court to examine, adjudge and decide on the Petitioners’ lawsuit, Friday (11/3).
The Decree was read by the Chief Justice of The Court himself who also acts as the Chairman of the plenary session, Moh. Mahfud MD. “To state, The Constitutional Court is not authorized to examine, adjudge and decide the Petitioners’ lawsuit,” announced Mahfud as he read the stipulation together with seven other justices.
The Petition filed by the Petitioners, Bibit, was intended for The Court to review the material within the Verdict of the Supreme Court No. 301K/Pdt/2004 dated June 29, 2005. The Petitioner considered himself as the legal holder of the right over a certified land had been at a loss and demanded The Court to decide on the legality of the letter.
Previously, The Court had carefully discussed the petition in the Justice Deliberation Meeting on Thursday, March 10, 2011. From the discussion it was revealed that the petition was obscure (obscuur libel) even though the substance of which could be understood. “Based on The Court’s understanding on the substance, The Court comes to a conclusion that the object of the petition do not come under the Constitutional Court’s jurisdiction to examine, adjudge and decide,” announced Hamdan Zoelva.
That was concluded according to the stipulation in Article 24C paragraph (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution, Article 10 paragraph (1) and (2) of Act No. 24 of 2003 on Constitutional Court and Act No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Authority (Yusti Nurul Agustin/mh/YDJ)
Friday, March 11, 2011 | 15:55 WIB 170